SOPHISTICATED

DUAL DOME SYSTEM

Report #009

10/11/2000 (1st post) - 12/4/2000 (1st rev) - 10/31/2003 (2nd rev)

 

This evidence is drawn from the MGS MOC AB1-10004 science data strip and demonstrates a sophisticated dual dome system located at the left side of the strip and of course the left side of my above first image. The main dome fills the whole interior of what appears at first glance to be a crater and the dome's top arched surface is heavily occluded as though it had a sand blasted.

The secondary portion of the dual dome system projects outside the "crater" formation to the right into the landscape in a sort of tapered oval shape. If you will look closely, you'll see that the occluded material of the interior dome also projects out from under the crater ring formation but then cuts off via a sharp demarcation line and the rest of the extension to the right beyond that demarcation line becomes a semi-clear transparent surface.

To the right of and below the "crater" elevated formation is a line of large dark spots but note that one to the immediate right of the crater formation and close to it strangely has a clear flattened looking arrow appendage sticking out pointing to the right. This site has a lot of heavy image tampering in it and I suspect that most or all of these dark spots are image tampering applications hiding something there in the open terrain. Therefore, I also suspect that the dark arrow appendage may also be a tampering artifact.

On the right side of the above image are a number of different size smooth rounded forms and each of the mid to larger size forms has a distinct cleared area around it implying artificiality and maintenance. All appear to have the same occluded material surface as the dome within the crater formation. I suspect that these are all utilitarian domes serving different unknown purposes.

In my opinion, most of the darker areas that are not outright black spots are also dithering smudge image tampering applications. This kind of application is very heavy in other areas of the strip outside the view of my images here.

The above second image offers a closer and perhaps the best view of the dual dome system. Here in this view you can possibly see that the crater is not really a impact crater at all but some sort of built up material possibly designed to mimic a crater site. This forms a thick protective elevated tall structure around the occluded round portion of the dome system located within and under it.

It is possible that there are building structures constituting part of this formation. It looks very much like that and especially the light color structure complete with two apparent windows on its end and throwing its own shadow up against the outer dome material on the outer edge right near the dark arrow spot. Unfortunately, this ring of "crater" mimicking protective structure has been subjected to a number of tampering applications with the most obvious being very dark spots on it having no correlation to shadow. The presence of the tampering spots on the structure tends to confirm that more obvious civilization evidence is probably under them and the target of the tampering.

In my opinion, the most telling evidence of all has to do with that portion of the dome projecting out to the right from the crater material perimeter. In this less blurry second image, note the sharp straight division line separating the occluded dome material from the clear portion projecting further to the right. To the left of the demarcation line extending under the crater formation wall is an occluded surface just like that in the interior of the crater structure and to the right of that sharp line is clear material projecting out into the terrain and tapering down to the ground along its sides forming an oval shape.

Take special note of the subtle sunlight that can clearly be seen reflecting off of the top surface of this dome surface material. Note the gradient manner of the sunlight reflection as it fades out going down the side confirming that this portion of the dome's top surface is curved or arched.

This extension of the interior dome to the right out from under the crater structure material into the open terrain and its more transparent quality no doubt serves functional purposes. For example, sunlight would strike the ground area under the transparent dome material more in this area. The ground would heat up and heat the air and that heated air would be trapped within the dome. Heated air of course rises and would naturally travel back under the crater structure toward the interior portion of the dome as the outer extension dome's curved surface rises back toward the crater formation setting up natural convection air currents by design.

The top surface of the occluded dome material within the crater structure interior no doubt mimics surrounding ground coloration and is probably designed to visually blend in with the general terrain in this area. However, the curved arch of the inner dome's height is given away by careful examination of the shadows at its edges. Note the narrow band of shadow on the lower right edge and how this quickly degrades from darker to lighter and then fading out completely moving from the right edge up toward the higher elevation center area of the dome. This clearly demonstrates that this is a arched curved surface typical of a dome artificial construct and not flat natural terrain within the crater.

The above third image offers a closer if a bit blurrier and grainier view of this sophisticated dual dome system. Here you can see the narrow band of shadow on the lower right side of the interior dome and how it degrades as it goes higher up the curved side of this dome's height. Here you can also see the sharp demarcation line between the occluded and clear material of the dome projecting out to the right into the terrain and especially the sunlight reflection off of the top surface and how it degrades going down the sides clearly demonstrating that this is also a curved surface and a artificial construct.

We are fortunate that the automated image tampering software concentrated on the geometric rectangular structures in and on the crater mimicking ring material but failed to recognize this round, clear, and straight linear visuals as civilization evidence worthy of its worst administrations and only made lighter applications. It is occasional mistakes like this in the tampering that make the normally dull task of looking at hundreds and thousands of heavily tampered with Mars images thoroughly sanitized of evidence worth pursuing. Of course this kind of thing is also the bane of the secrecy types and that's a good thing to.

If this visual data is examined very carefully and objectively, it is very powerful evidence of artificiality and civilization on Mars. This also demonstrates advanced technology, knowledge, and skills both in design and construction. The cleanliness of the outer surfaces of both exposed dome portions tells us that this site is being maintained and that in turn implies that this evidence almost certainly represents active civilization as opposed to defunct civilization and abandoned ruins.

For example, note that there appears to be no pile up of wind blown sediment or debris at the foot of the projection clear portion of the dome or on its rounded surface with sunlight reflecting off of it. Likewise, the crevasses at the outer edges of the crater interior portion of the dome show no signs at all of collection of sediment or debris and this area would definitely be a serious wind blown sediment trap, especially over very much time. In fact, one good dust storm would probably do it.

Once carefully and objectively examined, I regard artificiality and civilization evidence like this as some of the most significant to come out of Mars satellite imaging. It always amazes me how extraordinary hard visual evidence like this can be so thoroughly and even determinedly ignored by traditionalists. Since the evidence obviously speaks for itself, apparently it's all about personal belief systems and never mind any hard factual evidence to the contrary. In other words, I grew up believing that there can be no civilized life on Mars, I'm accustomed to that, I'm comfortable with it, and that's the end of it, and no more need be said. So what's your problem fellow and why do you bother?

It is in this way that ignorance and pretense sustains and perpetuates itself in populations and reality is avoided as long as humanly possible. The only trouble is that reality marches on doing its thing whether we perceive it or not or accept it or not. At this very moment, scenarios are likely forming and playing out relating to the true Mars reality that will significantly effect our lives here on Earth without any input or attempt at influence by us. Believe me, this is just not a good thing. We need to be involved in what happens to us.

SUMMARY POINTS:

(1) Dual dome system demonstrates civilization evidence on Mars.

(2) Dual dome system demonstrates civilization has advanced technology.

(3) Cleanliness of domes confirms maintenance & an active inhabitation.

DOCUMENTATION:

The easiest way to confirm and verify the above evidence behind me in the official science data is to access it at the links below. Note that the dual dome system is right at the left edge of the complete strip just up from the bottom.

http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/ab1100/ab110004.html: This link access the science data image at USGS and is much more convenient to use because here you don't have to download the whole strip to get a good look at the dual dome system evidence. Here the browser compatible image is presented in individually loadable sections. Click on the next to last section near the bottom of the page and you will get a big full view of the dual dome system that has already been enhanced at official level. In some ways it is as good as my imaging because it appears to have been worked up by someone from a closer resolution clearer image not released to the public.

http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/ab1_m04/images/AB110004.html: Alternatively, this links to the MSSS image. The browser compatible first listed JPEG and second listed GIF sinusodial (angled) strips work and have the same orientation and the faster loading JPEG strip is adequate for viewing this evidence for convenience albeit on a small scale. However, the third listed straight GIF strip, even though much slower loading, is much larger offering a closer view and has the same orientation as the others. Definitely use this third strip if you intend to download and then view and manipulate the image in a graphics program.

, Investigator