MARS CONVENTIONAL TREE
EVIDENCE: PART 3
Report #100
April 3, 2006
Part 1 ..... Part 2 ..... Part 4 ..... Part 5
The above ninth split-screen image here in Part-3 demonstrates two different scenes. There is of course the densely packed forest evidence on the left carpeting and hiding any natural geological terrain beneath it from view. These are old growth trees at one end of the image strip large enough to reasonably well overcome and come through the poor resolution and tampering meant to obscure most of this evidence. Even though the left image may not look much like it here because of tree size, this fairly good appearing evidence has in fact been fairly severely compromised by resolution and tampering problems. This is demonstrated by the right image and what is going on there that is also representative of what it going on in the rest of the strip.
The image on the right demonstrates the transition point in the image strip where the forest evidence begins to be more severely impacted by the obfuscation and it gets even worse moving more into this toward the other end. In the right image at the bottom, the very light color is a result of light color over-saturation of the image strip with only the most elevated tiny tips of the trees dark and visible against this now light color washed out background. This is actually all tree forest evidence but the greater impact of it in the right screen is the result of filters being used and is often the very effective method of choice in obscuring this kind of uniform knobby pattern type of tree forest evidence. Thought you might be interested in the A-B comparison and insight.
The above tenth image here in this Part-3 section demonstrates the same situation as in the above ninth image but it is sourced from a different strip. Again there is the dense tightly packed old growth larger tree forest evidence on the left and again it has been compromised by severe resolution and tampering problems in the overall image strip as represented by the image on the right. The difference in techniques used has resulted in a subtle difference in the left tree evidence visuals leaving them more rounded but it is still the same type of conventional tree forest evidence.
Although subtly altered and thereby partially obscured, the goal here apparently wasn't so much to completely obscure the big tree forest evidence on the left as it was to blank out and completely hide other evidence in this strip such as that in the right screen. This having to make balancing choices between different type of evidence needing obscuring and in this rare case making a inadequate obfuscation choice, probably made by the automated software programming itself, has allowed us a peak at the larger tree forest evidence. But, I can tell you that for every one of these mistakes made allowing a little real information to sneak through there are thousands of images where the obfuscation is effective, total and complete.
So are you curious as to what are the vaguely seen terrain forms behind and under all that light color over-saturated haze in the right screen? As you can see, it is completely effective as to its obfuscation purpose as long as the viewer doesn't question it and just moves on. However, as it turns out this tactical choice is very similar to that used in the ESA Hale crater imaging to obscure evidence as per my Report #084 and is one that can be partially defeated as you can see below.
The above 11th image here in Part-3 is the same 10th right screen image but here with the obfuscation partially defeated giving us a partial idea of what the obfuscation was hiding. Although poorly seen here, in this spot it appears to be densely packed heaped and piled tangles of thousands of "vine" looking objects. Further, this appears to be covering and hiding the natural terrain where they are thickest and, in other words, acting very much like some new to us darker non light reflective life engulfing terrain and looking nothing much like inanimate light reflective geology at all.
If this smaller evidence detail had not been obscured and had been well seen in reasonable detail in the original strip better than can be seen here, imagine what kind of detail we would have had of the large tree forest evidence. Further, the combination of both these two Mars life forms well seen in the imaging in just this one strip might have even made a slight dent in the science and academic close mindedness as to the presence of strange biological life on Mars and so it therefore had to go. It is the way it is with the space exploration imaging and how it is when trying to find something real in this manipulated science data nightmare.
Now let's move on to the Mars evidence in Part-4 at the link below. There I'm going to throw in some stronger conventional tree forest evidence along with some pretty strong surface water evidence for good measure. The forest evidence should be more comparable to the Earth forest evidence seen in Part-1 and therefore perhaps more telling in its own way than the evidence you've seen so far, especially with the forest visuals broken up by and contrasting with the lake evidence.
Part 1 ..... Part 2 ..... Part 5
DOCUMENTATION
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m07_m12/images/M09/M0900454.html: This link takes you to the official MGS MOC M09-00454 narrow-angle science data image strip from which this report's Part-3 ninth image was sourced.
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m07_m12/images/M09/M0901463.html: This link takes you to the official MGS MOC M09-01463 narrow-angle science data image strip from which this report's Part-3 tenth and eleventh images were sourced.
