MARS KAISER CRATER
ILLUSIONS

Report #113

January 6, 2007

 

The above first image is of a site within Kaiser Crater and sourced from the MGS MOC M21-01431 narrow-angle science data image strip. As you can see, the scene is of a huge broad field of ridge forms with what appears to be two isolated larger dunes just in the edge of this field and a small one down and just outside of the ridge form field. The above image has no graphics work in it by me and you are looking at above exactly what any scientist and academic researching this data will see.

Note the smooth texture of the dunes and that their aerodynamic shapes suggest having been influenced by wind forces. Note the subtle shading solar light reflections gleaming off of the smooth surfaces. These two larger objects do sort of look like sediment or sand dunes now don't they. The only problem with this perception is the semitransparent nature of the two larger dunes and especially the one on the right pointed out with the white arrow where objects at ground level under the dune are faintly seen. This forces one to ask oneself how can solid particulate matter like sand or sediment have any transparency factor at all, especially in such huge size and density, must less see vague objects on the ground through and within it?

But then that isn't all. Note all around the larger two dunes the complete absence of any evidence in the ridge form terrain of loose particulate scattered anywhere around these large objects that might have contributed to these supposedly piled up sediment dunes or for that matter any sediment that might have come off of them when they were being wind swept into this aerodynamic shape? On the other hand, look closely at the far right side of the small much lower profile dune in the foreground and you will see what appears to possibly be some loose sediment evidence on the ground there.

So why isn't loose sediment in evidence somewhere around the much larger and taller dunes and especially since the rougher terrain formed by the many parallel ridge form rows should have caught and held a lot of of this wind blown material? After all, these two dunes are very big, very tall, and very broad. They would have presented themselves as considerably resisting objects to winds tearing at them and strong enough to mold them into this smooth aerodynamic look. Yet that evidence just isn't there.

The lack of such confirming evidence and the transparency factor raises serious questions that are typical of a great deal of the dark dune field evidence on Mars that the sample dunes seen here in this report are suppose to be a part of and represent. What are we suppose to do, just label this evidence as just another weird, strange, anomalous, inexplicable thing on Mars and then move on without further thought?

After all, the official position is that these are dark sediment dune fields and so that's surely what they must be. Yes, that's all we need to know and who are we to question? Apparently that's what the secrecy agenda wants and what our well paid scientist are doing, taking a look, moving on, and not questioning. Well, in any case, let's take a closer look below at what they are passing over.

The above second image is a 200% closer view of the larger dune seen on the right in the preceding first image. Look closely. First, note that you will again see not much loose sediment in the terrain anywhere surrounding this object and note again that the transparency factor is revealed.

However, much more importantly, you will see the greatly enlarged pixels clustering to and constituting the bulk of this object. The easiest to see are those sample enlarged pixels pointed out with the three white arrows. Note how the total collective cluster of enlarged pixels conforms very precisely and intentionally to the object and its dimensions. Note also their complete absence in the ridge form field surrounding this object. These simple facts confirm that this is definitely not a general image artifact problem. In other words, not even the slightest possibility of chance imaging artifacts here. No matter how it may be denied and passed off as a technical glitch, this is clearly and conclusively catching someone in the act of intent to obscure and create misdirection of perception of visual information from another world.

It is these artificially enlarged pixels and the exaggerated blur they produce that gave the object its smooth texture and dune appearance when viewed in the more distant first official resolution image. Since they mapped to the original object area, they also replicated the original light and dark shading. In other words, the dune look is an intentional artificial illusion, just poorly done in the mistakes of preserving a measure of material transparency and making the pixels just too incredibly large and obvious allowing the mistakes of its artificial application as well as its purpose of obfuscation to be revealed.

However, what must be understood is that there is a real huge anomalous hidden object here, only the presented dune appearance of it is false. Now look even closer at the back top edge and to the right of that into the darker shadow area of the concave section, all pointed out by the three red arrows. The enlarged pixels didn't quite encompass and overlap all of the object's edge and blur out all detail there and this to is a mistake. There is the tiny detail of many different smaller object patterns on or within this massive overall object at these edges.

The orientation and pattern of these densely packed tiny object patterns do not in any way coincide with the immediately adjacent parallel rows of ridge forms nor could they have been confused with the "dune" look. This tiny high density pattern would have stood out in very sharp contrast to the surrounding completely different pattern of the ridge forms drawing the eye like a magnet draws steel. At the very minimum it would have suggested life of some kind and at most high technology as well, so it had to be eliminated.

The slight of hand misdirection of choice was to subtly bend perception by artificially creating a smooth texture that suggested safer appearing geology and the "dune" concept. I cannot say conclusively what this image tampering hides but logically it is almost certainly life evidence of some kind on Mars. Logically only this kind of evidence could warrant going to this kind of illusion creating trouble and expense. That is why there is no evidence of loose sediment in the terrain around these objects because they are constructs and not geological sand dunes at all. As I've reported before, there are legitimate sediment dunes on Mars but many of these dune looking massive objects are something else entirely and of variety.

So why wouldn't someone doing this put some smudge in the surrounding terrain to represent loose sediment and reaffirm the dune geology illusion? Because we talking about super high speed automated software computer programmed applications here dealing with many tens of thousands of images with millions upon millions of variety of detail in them. As good as it is, and it is very good by our technology standards, the sheer number magnitude of the tampering task literally guarantees that every problem cannot be anticipated in the preprogramming and that both mistakes and technical glitches will occur. As I've indicated a number of times, anomalous evidence is revealed to us mostly by mistakes made in the otherwise normally very good but ultimately imperfect image tampering.

Meanwhile, in this report, you need to understand that this mistake and artificial illusion isn't some kind of aberration in a single image. So the following image evidence is drawn from a different additional strip demonstrating more samples of the same kind of artificially created illusion evidence and in the same Kaiser Crater.

The above third image and its evidence is drawn from a different MGS MOC M21-01944 science data strip and also from within Kaiser Crater. Again note that this scene is viewed at the official resolution and just what scientist and academic researchers would be seeing and without any graphics work in it by me. Again we have aerodynamic shaped dunes in a broad expansive field of ridge form evidence. Again note the transparency factor within each of the dunes down there that should have been a clue for professional researchers viewing this material to examine this evidence closer.

Again the above fourth image demonstrates a 200% closer view concentrating on the two center dunes in the preceding third image. Again note the lack of any loose sediment in the terrain surrounding these objects. Once again, if you will look closely, you'll see the enlarged pixels that obscure the evidence while at the same time giving it the smooth texture and dune look in the much more distant third image view.

However, this time the enlarged pixels encompass all of the objects including their perimeter edges leaving nothing for us at the edges as was the case with the second image evidence. In other words, the work here is a little more thorough from the obfuscation point of view. Also, once again, note the the enlarged pixels are tightly confined to these objects and are not present in the surrounding terrain confirming that this is not a general technical imaging glitch but an intentional well focussed and defined act of obfuscation.

The above fifth image and its evidence is drawn from the same MGS MOC M21-01944 science data strip as the third and fourth images but of a scene a little lower down in the strip. Again note that this scene is viewed at the official resolution and just what scientist and academic researchers would be seeing and without any graphics work in it by me.

Again we have what roughly appear to be dunes in a broad expansive field of ridge form evidence. Again note the even more pronounced and obvious transparency factor within the dunes down there and especially the one on the right that should have again been a clue for professional researchers viewing this material to examine this evidence closer. If they had examined closer, below is what they would have seen of the dune on the right in the above image.

As you can see, the above sixth image shows the dune on the right in a 200% closer view. Again, if you will look closely, you can see the enlarged pixels that obscure the real underlying massive object area sitting in this broad field of ridge forms. However, this time the dune appearance illusion is not so effective because a large portion of the hidden object area has some elevated tall massive rectangular dimensions distorting the smooth aerodynamic dune shape and throwing a dark shadow all its own to the right.

Note the enlarged pixels mapping to that upper right rectangular portion of the object's dimension but also adding enough layers of smudge to blank out the elevated tall massive portion of the rectangular object. This was done because this particular tall massive portion of the object area is just too large and could not have been adequately blurred out by the enlarged pixel technique alone. That meant that layers of smudge had to be added to get rid of its no doubt geometric shape.

However, left just outside of the tampering field at this place is the dark shadow to the immediate right of the tall massive object. That was a mistake because the shape of that shadow confirms the tall straight vertical sided appearance of a portion of the hidden object. Clearly something real, tall and massive is throwing that deep dark shadow. Remember that someone here on Earth is seeing what is really here and preventing anyone else like you and I from seeing anything real, only an illusion. Obviously, we are out of the need to know loop and had nothing at all to say in the matter. That's true even though it is our tax dollars that enabled the true information and the real true imaging is our legal property and most definitely not the exclusive property of those that are suppose to be acting on our behalf in our space exploration programs.

Likewise, note that the transparency factor immediately below the tall massive rectangular object was not obliterated enough and shows a little too much of what is being obscured. That is the trouble with using enlarged pixels alone as the sole obscuring methodology. Now what we can see isn't really enough to conclusively identify what is being hidden and remember that the enlarged pixels are magnifying as well as distorting and blurring what we can see. Even so, although heavily distorted, the patterns seen are still very suggestive of packed multiple height geometric city structures, just visually blurred and distorted.

Do any of you remember my prior 2004 reporting of similarly obscure extremely tall massive structures on the Moon? If not check out the images in Report #067 titled "Moon Tower Evidence" and Report #068 titled "More Massive Moon Objects." In that earlier Clementine mission evidence predating this MGS MOC mission evidence, enlarged pixels were not used there and layers of opaque smudge was the choice. But, the automated mapping technology resulted in the smudge tightly conforming to the shape of the objects because they were over size and massive revealing a little information as to their shapes and sizes. It is similar here in this evidence where the mapping technology results in the enlarged pixels adhering roughly to the dimensions of the objects to be obscured.

You know the old saying about where there is smoke there is fire? At the very minimum, this type of clearly intentional image tampering undeniably exist here in the MGS MOC data and its purpose is clearly to hide something specific in this terrain and keep it away from public knowledge. What do you think that something is? Do any of you really believe that someone is going to all this trouble and expense to hide rocks, soil or other geology or for that matter surface water? There just is no conceivable reason to do so unless we are to believe that the secrecy agenda types involved in our space exploration programs have lost their minds.

Logically the goal of this level of tampering purposefully creating geological dune look illusions is to hide life on another world just as is the case with the Moon imaging. But, if so, what is there to hide about simple biological life like trees or even lichen forests? How can that be perceived as any kind of significance to anyone here on Earth and warrant secrecy for that reason? Logically we have to move on past geology and simple biological life reasons to intelligent civilized life to even begin to understand any reasoning for the secrecy. But, what could possibly be perceived as necessary for secrecy about civilizations on another distant world running around on their planet at technological levels matching or less than our own? How can that be worthy of secrecy? Can you buy into that?

To me, this evidence of going to all of the trouble and expense of this image tampering and keeping so much as secret as possible from our own people logically only begins to make just a little sense if we are talking about, not just intelligent civilized life, but technologically advanced life more advanced than our own and very likely a lot more advanced. First, life that has the capacity to not only easily defend its own turf but to deliver a very real threat directly to Earth if need be thereby galvanizing the need for great caution on our end. Second, life that has something (technology?) that someone here on Earth wants to gain and monopolize without being interfered with here on Earth by laws, moral conventions, and public interference.

As Mr. Spock on Star Trek would say, the logic is inescapable. That is unless you wish to believe that the secrecy agenda types here on Earth are benevolent and are doing all this to protect us from ourselves (46+ year old Brookings Report anyone?) and for the good of us all so that we will not have to experience disturbing change (growth?). I have no doubt that they would justify their position in this regard. Okay maybe it is the suspicious professional investigator in me but, while I might be able to accept a very few unique individuals as having some benevolent intentions like this, I find it very hard to accept the secrecy agenda collective as a whole here on Earth as being mostly benevolent in its intentions. That just does not match my experience, or for that matter historical experience, with Earth humanity leadership in association with the exercise of secrecy in conjunction with power.

As a matter of argument, if our social systems are so tender and built on sand that they can be so easily toppled by such knowledge, then what good are such systems to us really! If that's the case, then we need to grow into better more realistic systems that better fit our greater environment and its reality. If other life advanced beyond our own exists around us in our greater planetary environment, then future interaction with it is as absolutely certain as anything can be and trying to pretend and hold back hanging onto junk and useless stuff is just not conducive to basic survival must less surviving reasonably well.

Likewise, we know that power and especially isolation along with power corrupts big time. The old feudal system of the haves and have not's and we as surfs with lords over us making our decisions for us like children is suppose to be long gone. Those promoting secrecy create isolation for themselves forming polarizing schisms between them and us. Further, the secrecy hands over immense corrupting power to them without any form of check and balance. If we want to be a part of shaping our own destiny, we're going to have to step up to the task of closing and healing this schism before power corrupted self serving ends an paranoia has its way in behind the scenes decision making beyond our awareness putting more than just our social systems in jeopardy.

Do you want some secret few to do all your thinking and decision making for you? The last time I looked wide spread ignorance never and I do mean NEVER comes to a good end. If we allow ourselves to be treated like children or cattle, then that's what we become by default because we are what we actually do, not what we say we're going to do or intend to do. By participating in this passive do little to nothing way, we literally insure that we will be treated in this way by events and anyone else concerned. It is all a matter of choice and choosing to not choose is most definitely a choice and with consequences.

DOCUMENTATION

http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m19_m23/images/M21/M2101431.html: This link takes you to the official MGS MOC M21-01431 science data narrow-angle image strip from which my first and second image evidence here in this report was drawn. I used the slower loading but higher detail straight .GIF strip.

http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m19_m23/images/M21/M2101944.html: This link takes you to the official MGS MOC M21-01944 science data narrow-angle image strip from which my third through sixth image evidence here in this report was drawn. I used the slower loading but higher detail straight .GIF strip.

, Investigator