MARS DUNES OR MEGA LIFE?
Part-2
Report #125
September 1, 2007
The above sixth image introduces you to mega size "dune" evidence as it appears in the MGS MOC E01-02137 strip view from one side edge of the strip to the other. Note that this image is a funky looking due in part because this was apparently filmed in twilight and the image has very poor resolution. I've colorized it a bit to help differentiate detail a little better but it is otherwise the official science data view.
This is the type of mega dune evidence that is the subject of this reporting. To be fair I've chosen to display this one poor quality compromised strip to show you here because of the evidence's different stages of appearance in it. Here the evidence all looks a little more sand dune like, especially in the right split screen scene, and this favors the official interpretation of this type of evidence. It helps one appreciate how the official and consensus scientist interpretation of this type of evidence can be understandable.
The Part-2 reporting here will tend to explore how this evidence can appear strange, borderline and ambiguous tending to default to the "dune" interpretation mostly because of the lack of a better explanation. However you will see, as this reporting and the subsequent evidence imaging progresses here into Part-3, the evidence will become increasingly harder and harder to accept such a simplistic sand duneinterpretation even when one considers that this evidence is on a different world and may be expected to look different.
The above seventh image demonstrates the official science data black and white view of the entire E01-02137 strip and the dark color dune field. As you can see, dark color evidence may a bit strange looking but not enough to really question as being that much different than sand dune fields we might see in some places here on Earth, at least in this more distant view. It is easy to take a quick look at it and move on if you are a scientist researching this imaging and that is also how they are duped.
Look more closely at the very light color area in the left end panel. Note the faintly seen pattern detail of many same size and height small objects still just barely visible there. I have not enhanced this image's detail at all. If I had, you would be seeing a much more detailed pattern of densely packed vegetation mass there. It's easier for me to recognize such subtleties due to long experience in this imaging and this look as well as the pattern of the dark "dune" field tells me that this image has been inverted at official level and so that makes this whole scene an obfuscation illusion, plausible looking "sort of" but quite false.
It tells me that the truth will be that the dark dune field isn't dark at all but a light reflective tone and what forms are downward oriented are actually elevated and vice versa. Further, that the white over saturation area in the upper part of the left panel scene is actually a dark color consistent with with vegetation doing its light absorption photosynthesis thing. This is how both the "dune" field and the vegetation are disguised in one simple tactical move. In other words, it is misdirection both subtle and effective.
The above eighth image from the same strip provides a closer view of a section of the dark dune field as measured from one side of the full view strip to the other side. As you can see, what looked fairly reasonable from a distant view in the seventh image now takes on a more questionable aspect and it becomes harder to resolve this as sand dune material or, for that matter, anything familiar or real at all. That's because it isn't real.
In fact, although I do not recommend trying it at all and advise against it, if you study and concentrate on this image and its incorrectness confusion long enough, your brain subconsciously recognizing that something is wrong with it may automatically invert the image in your perception and suddenly things will look entirely different and perhaps began to make more sense. If you go against my advise and do this, don't be shocked at the results or that such a thing can happen to you without you consciously being in control. It is normal behavior.
In fact, there is no need to try such an experiment with yourself as the above ninth image does it for you and provides the correct inverted back to proper perspective view of the "dune" mega size evidence and I've even colorized it a bit to mimic the appearance of sand as we are more familiar with it. However, remember that the science data as publicly released is black and white imaging and the true color of this particular mega evidence is unknown. I mention this because any true color and its absence here could play a major role in accurate identification as well as the obfuscation of this evidence and one shouldn't forget that.
Of course the most obvious visual factor here is the tremendous size of this evidence as well as its side-by-side row jammed against row configuration. The next is the segmented appearance and the sharp division depression lines between the rows. Less obvious but perhaps a little more sand dune like is the occasional blending across of sections between the rows. Now, to make sure it isn't some kind of aberration, let's do this again in the next two images below taken from a different section of this strip.
Basically the above tenth and eleventh images are the same story. However, here the divisions between the rows are perhaps a little more pronounced and there are also less spots sharing narrow connects across the rows emphasizing this impression. Note that all the "dune" evidence in this strip have the impression of closely spaced segments or joints for the lack of a better identifying moniker. This is typical of the appearance of a the mega size evidence.
However, even though this evidence is clearly mega size, be forewarned that I suspect that this more closely spaced segment appearance may still represent a less mature stage of development. Let's move on to Part-3 at the link below to explore more on this.
DOCUMENTATION
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e13_e18/images/E13/E1302027.html: This link takes you to the official E13-02027 narrow-angle science data strip from which my above 6th image was drawn.
http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e01_e06/images/E01/E0102137.html: This link takes you to the official E01-02137 narrow-angle science data strip from which my above 7th — 11th images were drawn.
