MOON FAKERY-1
Report #190
July 25, 2010
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down page to AS08-13-2225)
The above 1st image from the Apollo
8 Moon data image AS08-13-2225 demonstrates
some kind of long skinny kinked bright reflective filament. This was brought
to my attention by a sharp eyed viewer named Tomas Rodriguez. Note that the
object does not appear to be casting any shadow on the ground. This suggests
that the object, if it is legitimate, is either laying directly on the ground
or an object too far above ground and too slender to be throwing much of a
shadow on the ground.
That is, if the object was legitimate, which it isn't. A little testing reveals
that this object in my opinion came to be in the image after it was processed
or while it was processed on a subsequent occasion. Now that doesn't necessarily
mean that this object is an intentional added fake as it could have been introduced
by accident and especially if the original image was processed more than once
over time to produce what we're look at now. Remember that this is Apollo
8 data from 1968, so it likely started out as film later to be transferred
to digital media for us to have access to it online now in this time.
It is true that a great deal of the older data on film had to be scanned in
to recreate it in digital format for display online. Further, it appears that
this process was apparently often conducted carelessly in an insufficiently
clean environment where a lot tiny debris was also scanned in making its way
into many of the digital images. A typical scenario would be hairs, etc.
On the other hand, if some of the original data was a little too informative
from a secrecy agenda point of view, the involved process of transferring
the data from the original older film media to newer digital media would have
presented an additional opportunity to "fix" any "problems."
The filament above may be a result of debris getting into the scanning process
due to human carelessness but no such ambiguity exists with the next evidence
below?
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down page to AS08-13-2225)
The above 2nd image provides a much wider
context view. Note that the filament location is in the bottom center of this
image as pointed out by the red arrow. Note that the filament location is
in a very pronounced sunken and wide arrow straight depression course on the
Moon surface pointed out with a yellow arrow. Note that this depression course
extends back up to and stops at the outer edge of a large crater rim rise
in the terrain.
However, the problem is that the wide straight depression course, after being
interrupted by the crater rim continues on up uninterrupted across the crater's
interior floor as pointed out with the blue arrow. Now, if the impact crater
is legitimate, then this is quite impossible and yet there is the visual evidence.
Obviously the impact creating the crater throwing up its elevated rim would
have destroyed the straight depression course inside the crater.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down page to AS08-13-2225)
I've included the above even larger wide-angle
context 3rd image showing the relative size and shape of the crater in question
on the left as well as those nearby it just in case you may begin to question
whether or not this might be a true impact crater with the depression course
running through its interior floor. As you can see above, it obviously is
an impact crater but now the question becomes whether it is real or not? I'm
saying to you that the crater rim areas are likely not real but an image tampering
"creation" covering over and hiding something someone considered
important at this location.
Of course the terrain inside and outside the crater rim could be fake and
the rim real. However, that would mean that this "designer" terrain
with the depression course feature was later installed inside and outside
the crater but that would then presume who ever did this was an idiot to install
something fake that would draw attention to itself as a fake. More likely,
a smudge coating was applied on exiting terrain features to blot out what
ever is there with no crater existing at all, then the crater rim installed,
and then the peppering of smaller rocks and pits and their shadows installed
on top of that to promote better realism. In such a scenario, who or what
ever did this just simply overlooked that the depression course printing through
the smudge would reveal all. That would be more typical of careless human
behavior at the time of carelessly scanning the data and/or human design in
AI super computer programming.
Now take a look at the crater to the immediate right of the large left crater.
Note the smoother area between the two craters. Note how the smoother area
comes up too high on the left outside rim of the crater on the right. In my
opinion, this is a smooth smudge tampering field application extending out
from the left crater area and it has been applied too close to the right crater's
left rim. The smudge application also coats the interior floors of these craters.
As I say, to keep these smudge application fields from looking too blank and
thereby conspicuous, a peppering of small impact craters and rocks with their
attendant shadows are added to simulate realism.
This tampering practice is common in my experience and normally very effective
causing me to just have to move on without reporting because I knew it would
be too hard for most viewers to adequately recognize. However, the problem
for them here was the fact that there was a very definitive pronounced long
ground feature in the form of the depression course that existed across the
terrain spanning a distance both inside and outside the area that needed the
tampering applications.
An alert human would have likely caught the implications of this and installed
a new different topography floor inside the crater to obliterate the straight
depression course. However, an AI super computer would not likely have been
programmed to recognize such implications at the time the scanning was done
and as far as it is concerned a straight depression course is not something
that needs its special attentions.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down page to AS08-13-2225)
The evidence of the most significance
is in the above closer image of the crater rim where the straight depression
course is present on either side of the crater rim. The elevated impact crater
rim is a designer created fake laid down over what was originally level terrain
covered and flattened by smudge there before the rim was added. This brings
up all kinds of questions as to what that smudge covers and what that straight
depression course could really be?
However, look at all that wonderful "created" fake detail. That
is significant too. If it had not been for the mistake of that straight depression
course revealing the crater rim's presence as an application fake, who would
ever know the difference? Who would ever question? Looks perfectly real doesn't
it. Even worse, note that this kind of sophisticated advanced image manipulation
has somehow gotten into the 42 year old 1968 Apollo 8 mission data. How did
that happen? Likely it happened when this data was converted from film to
digital media.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down page to AS08-13-2225)
Questions? Questions? However, that's
not quite all that can be reported from this supposedly 42 year old Moon image.
If we can believe anything in this image, the above 5th and last image demonstrates
what may be a couple of small UFOs in flight over the crater to the immediate
right of the fake one. Let's assume for the moment that the dark area is legitimate
(?) crater shadow. If the small bright objects pointed out by the yellow arrows
was something at ground level, then they like everything else in the shadow
would have their reflectivity substantially subdued by the shadow.
If they are real and not scanned debris, the fact that these small objects
are so bright sunlight reflective over the dark shadow area means that they
are in a position in the air elevated well above the crater and its shadow
area. There are others over sunlit ground areas in this image but then you
get into debates as to whether they are above ground on part of the Moon's
surface. If this is not more debris caught in the scanning process, this is
telling evidence if one can believe in anything coming from an image where
someone is caught manipulating it on a large scale.
The point of this reporting is that someone in control of this Moon imaging
data has gone to a lot of trouble not just to sanitize the image of truthful
information in it but adding skilled "created" illusions that point
in a purely geological direction they want you and I and scientists to limit
our thinking to. For example, see the many small crater pitted and rock strewn
surfaces and their attendant shadows. If accepted at face value, there's no
reason from secrecy's point of view for you and I or scientists to think in
"undesirable" terms of possible civilizations and aliens now is
there.
It's a nice safe comfortable picture but the problem is that it just isn't
real. Someone is not just simply hiding something here, they are actively
playing manipulation head games with us to block truth and perception. Such
a high level of commitment to obfusdation is a direct measure of how important
and possibly disturbing who ever is doing this thinks the truth being hidden
here is. Further, as a population we here on this planet are buying into this
fabrication and fantasy hook, line, and sinker based on a level of trust that
it is increasingly becoming clear is misplaced.
Is someone here afraid that Earth's populations will freak out if faced with
what ever truth is being hidden here? If true, is getting a little freaked
out really such a bad thing? For example, there is a beautiful intelligent
young woman of celebrity status here in the USA addicted to a destructive
life style trying as hard as she can to avoid realities that she perceives
as threatening and unpleasant. Now she's faced with an unwanted semi-jail
time reality and the consequences of her actions of just wanting to, as she
says, have a little fun.
Do any of you really think it is healthy for this girl to just keep on floating
along in her fantasy unreality? If she continues this course, is there really
any doubt as to the negative outcome for her? It's clear that she needs to
wake up to survive and the only way she's going to be able to do that is if
she has to live a bit with what she doesn't want to face and begin to understand
the consequences of her actions on herself. Whoa! Why could it be that's us
and we're her? Could it be that she's just a little more extreme example of
what we populations are doing to ourselves and allowing to be done to us?
Like the starlet, we need to become fed up enough with our addiction to daily
doses of shallow mediocrity self gratification and kick our addiction to safe
appearing fantasies that are really not safe at all, especially since someone
else is conducting our business for us but not for our benefit and for their
own. We need our wake-up call and to be facing some truths. If some of the
truths are disturbing and/or difficult, like the starlet, we have no special
entitlements and avoidance will just make the consequences worse for us in
the end.
By lapping up the fantasy pabulum and insisting on concentrating on self gratification,
we in our addictions are once again allowing civilization to be corrupted
from within. That path of refusing to face our consequences and trying to
abdicate responsibility to others is historically strewn with our massive
failures and setbacks.
For example, we left offshore drilling to government and they in turn left
it to an oversight agency that itself had no oversight. Predictably the agency
was infiltrated by those they were suppose to regulate and did come to do
the bidding of those they were suppose to regulate. What a surprise! NASA
anyone? When you throw down the ball in favor of more personal gratification
pursuits, expect that others will pick it up to serve their own purposes and
not ours.
, Investigator
