COLOSSAL HEAD &
ANIMAL MONUMENTS
Report #003
8/2000 (orig post) - 12/15/2000 (1st rev) - 06/27/2003 (2nd rev)
The above first image is the entire MGS MOC M02-00164 third listed straight oriented strip from corner to corner just as it appears in the official science data, including size and resolution. Except for the arrows and text labels that I've added to point out the anomalous evidence, there are no other changes or enhancements by me in this image. Make no mistake about it, this is some of the most incredible and extraordinary evidence to come out of any satellite imaging of another world made available to the public.
As you can see, the most striking anomaly here is most definitely the human or humanoid head sitting upright in the terrain with only the upper areas of the head visible from the mid nose area up. Note that this object's surface is smooth contrasting sharply with the rough terrain it sits in demonstrating that it is almost certainly an artificially smoothed creation. Note that the head is balding and perfectly anatomically correct complete with nose projection and two recessed closed eye areas under a forehead and brow, again anatomically correct. The lower portions of the head are obscured by image tampering applications.
If its mere presence isn't enough, consider the absolutely colossal size of this monument. I've made some crude calculations and according to my hand measurements, this head occupies a conservative 16% of the width of this official strip and the MSSS statistical data says that the strip has a scaled image width of 120.67 km. Therefore according to official statistics the head is 120.67 km x 16% = 19.31 km wide. With 1 km equaling .62137 mile and the strip being 120.67 km x .62137 = 74.98 miles wide, then this head monument is 74.98 miles x 16% = 12 miles wide. In other words, at 19+ km or 12 miles wide, this immense monument is the size of a entire very large mountain. Now that is colossal in every sense of the word.
Don't forget that this is a WIDE-ANGLE context image providing a wide area regional view where only really huge objects can be seen at all as opposed to the usual narrow-angle closer resolution strips. For example, a structure the size of the Empire State Building would be far too small to be seen at all in this image. As another example, consider that the Mars "Face" image that so much controversy swirls around would also be too small to be visible at all in this scene. That should give you an idea of the colossal size scale involved here. So, with that comparison in mind, I have to wonder how evidence with too many ambiguous qualities like the Mars "Face" can continue to get so much attention from so many while incredibly powerful much stronger and much more obvious high quality evidence like this is essentially ignored?
But, that isn't the only civilization evidence here. In the lower left corner of the image, you can see what looks very much like an animal sitting compact and upright with forearms and forepaws resting close together in the center area of the body on an elevated rock. Note the pointed face and nose, upright ears, eyes, ringed body, and ringed tail wrapping around to left from behind the body. This Raccoon like animal looks not exactly like but still very similar to a Red Panda found here on Earth.
In the lower right corner of the image, you can also see what may be a strange looking dark pictograph in the light color terrain. This appears to be a stylized representation or emblem of some creature life form but who knows what this form may represent on another different world? Just above the pictograph form is a dark area that I suspect is part of a smaller river system that comes from our right to left across in front of the giant head where it disappears there in some image tampering application that crosses over the lower portion of the head obscuring the area where a mouth might be. It is possible that this smaller river may have been designed to symbolically flow into the mouth of this colossal monument in this tampering obscured area, pass through the head bottom area, and empty into the larger river that comes from above to the back of this head.
Finally, I would be remiss if I did not point out the image tampering in this image. It is extensive including subtly up around the main monuments and in most other areas of this image. The featureless fog treatment over the river system is particularly crude and heavily done with distinct well defined edges designed to thoroughly blot out something and they didn't even seem to care how obvious it was as tampering. I suspect most of this tampering is designed to obscure view of civilization and also happens to unavoidably obscure the water evidence as well.
The bottom areas of the head monument are obscured by multiple partially transparent tampering application treatments designed to carefully blend in and appear as terrain. One of these layers can be seen passing across the lower portion of the nose and cheek area. This single partially transparent layer turns the object under it slightly darker. However, the subtle dark to medium color smudge areas surrounding the animal monument and even the small amount crossing across the animal's front paws on the rock area have actually served to isolate and make the animal monument stand out more sharply in the terrain. I suspect this is intentional to, as better explained below.
While we're on the subject of tampering, you should know that any and all suggestion of these colossal monuments has been completely blotted out in the decades old Viking imaging (as evidenced in my fifth image below in this report) of this same area. Tellingly, that is the case even though these same monuments are clearly visible (remember that 12 miles across head size) in numerous more WIDE-ANGLE imaging strips as listed and linked below. In other words, now you see a 12-mile across massive object and now you don't. Even the most die hard loyal fan of official positioning should be able to recognize that there is something seriously wrong with such things happening in official science data.
M02-01454 ..... M03-00325 ..... M03-01568 ..... M03-06818 ..... M07-05293
M08-01075 ..... M09-01756 ..... M11-01039 ..... M15-01271 ..... M22-02033
All of the above listed wide-angle image strips plus the M02-0164 strip used here clearly demonstrates in multiple camera imaging events the presence of these anomalies. So their being missing from and being removed from the older Viking data tells us that someone knew about this massive monumental civilization evidence all the way back in at least the 1970's. Further, the now obscuring of this same evidence with gradually increased image tampering in the most recent "Extended" series of MOC imaging tells us that someone didn't like the idea of this being left out of the tampering and is gradually trying to increasingly obscure it and minimize it back into obscurity while at the same time trying to keep your attention via misdirection focussed on debates over more ambiguous and less resolvable material like the "Face" that conveniently never lead anywhere.
The presence of all this image tampering in this particular MOC image, but without covering this massive monument civilization evidence and it even framing and accentuating the ability to see the animal monument, suggests that this most obvious of civilization evidence was intentionally left out to bring attention not only to this particular monument evidence but to the narrow-angle imaging of this region of Mars by someone within the secrecy ranks. Someone possibly rebelling and not agreeing with total secrecy on this issue.
When I investigated the narrow-angle imaging strips of this area, some very important additional civilization evidence discoveries were revealed. This confirms to me the correctness of the speculation that these monuments appear to have been intentionally left out of the tampering by someone unknown to us to serve as red flags to draw the attention of those viewing this data to, not only this colossal monumental evidence, but also this region on Mars. Leaving these colossal monuments available for viewing clearly says look closer.
The above second image now enhanced by me for clarity also offers a closer view and probably the best view with all the civilization evidence together in the same image. Here you can see the head and animal monuments together better as well as what may be a huge creature pictograph and water evidence in the lower right corner area. Please also note the absence of any significant shadows being thrown by these huge objects. While the secrecy types would no doubt like for you to believe that this is because these objects are just low profile chance configurations of ground detail, the truth is that most of the shadows and the terrain around the monuments has been covered up by image tampering.
While we're looking at the above 2nd image of this general area, let me tell you what I suspect and think is happening here under all this tampering partly based on the evidence from this strip and partly based on other information not in evidence here drawn from other strips. This is speculation that I'm indulging in but I am doing so here because I believe that posterity will eventually prove this correct and pretty close to the mark.
There is a large long river system here (completely blotted out by dark image tampering) that comes into this scene from the upper left corner of this image crossing over to the middle area and then turns down coming up behind the head monument but then deflects around it to pass between these two colossal monuments and off the bottom of the image. These colossal monuments may represent the ceremonial and symbolic entrance to not only a heavily populated rough terrain region but also one of governmental power located along this river system and in the terrain extending far back behind and around these monuments. The river system and its immediate populated environs are blotted out by very obvious and crude image tampering both in the MOC imaging and the older Viking imaging.
This is done I suspect because too much of the thick civilization evidence along its length is very large in size meaning that distance resolution tampering cannot adequately obscure it. This is after all an area of extremely large monuments designed to impress someone and it is likely that many other structures along this river system are likewise designed to the same purpose of impressing. Don't forget the size scale involved here. Remember that this is wide-angle imaging and that the head is about 12 miles across. That makes the river system running between the two colossal monuments really much larger than it appears here in this imaging and huge by any standards.
I suspect that this area has been brought to our attention because the population in this area on Mars is probably represented by humans or at least humanoid types. The evidence of this is of course in the human Buddha looking balding head monument. But, that isn't all, it's also in some of the MOC narrow-angle strips of this area and the civilization center building structure evidence I've reported on in other reports. The type of structures and the patterns of their layout are little more typical of Earth civilization centers and are a bit different than the row pattern civilization structure placement patterns in other population center evidence elsewhere on the planet that I've reported on.
One example is my report #004 titled "Aircraft, Buildings & Other Anomalies." This and a lot more evidence separately reported on were drawn from the same MOC official M02-00163 strip. Note that the colossal monument evidence presented here is drawn from this M02-00164 wide-angle context strip that is the direct companion to the M02-00163 narrow-angle strip. Coincidence? I doubt it.
In any case, note that these colossal monuments are designed to be seen with maximum visual impact from both the ground and from the air. Imagine yourself approaching this region of intelligent civilized life via passing between these colossi at ground level or in a low flying aircraft flying an approach corridor that maximizes their visual impact as you pass by, above, or between them. Together straddling this river system they are clearly designed to impress anyone approaching who is not very familiar with them and even those that are familiar with them for that matter. This reinforces the concept that this is probably a seat of governing power for this region of the planet by someone who at least has similarities to us, even if with technology probably more advanced than our own.
In the above third split screen image, I've attempted to provide an even closer and better view of the two main anomalies by enhancing their images individually while still presenting them in a side by side comparison view. I've done this because the animal monument with its light and dark patterns and rough texture probably imitating a animal furred surface is more light absorbing while the giant head is smoother with a lighter color and of course more light reflective. In other words, when it comes to clarifying these two anomalies, what works on one works against the other when viewed together in the same image. As you can see, this split imaging does offer a closer more informative but also more grainy and blurry view. They are best viewed by leaning back away from the computer screen and looking at them or even stepping back well away from the screen and looking at them, including from across a small room.
Take special note of all that foggy, smudgy, featureless image tampering around the animal monument tending to outline it. As I've said above, this animal monument object is actually being enhanced "presented" to us by this tampering to frame it and make it more obvious. While the head monument might stand out in a relatively cluttered rough terrain because of its smoothness, contours, and uniform high light reflectivity, this darker more rugged animal monument with so many alternating color patterns creating a striped look would definitely have tended to merge and disappear into what was probably originally a visually cluttered rough terrain of light and dark patterns without the tampering now subduing the background visuals. That is one of the clues to why I suspect this evidence of being intentionally left out of the tampering and literally "presented" to researchers by someone not towing the party line.
In other words, someone did what they could to help you and I out here in the public and they are to be commended for it and are due our utmost respect and gratitude. Unfortunately, what they could not help us with is the thoroughly conditioned mindset of most researchers viewing this material and their being unable to accept hard visual evidence right in front of their eyes clearly pointing to intelligent life on Mars. For them, before the evidence can even get in front of them, their mind is made up that Mars is a hard frozen, dry, dead world and that's the end of it. No objectivity, no open mindedness, no just following the evidence and where it may lead, only single minded preconceived prejudice filtering and expunging unacceptable evidential data from perception that does not fit the already accepted model.
I've included the above fourth flipped or reversed image orientation to demonstrate that the head monument is in fact a 3-dimensional object for those who might want to argue that this is just a one dimensional chance configuration of ground level terrain. Note that it is clearly massive, tall, and smoothed creating strong light reflectivity relative to the terrain immediately around it. This smoothness is obviously most likely by artificial means since there is nothing else smooth like this in the surrounding rough terrain and don't forget that 12-miles across size scale. Note the 3-dimensional brows and the nose projection and the still anatomically correct shape sticking out of surrounding image tampering applications. Looks pretty self evident and clear to me.
Just in case some detractors might be tempted to argue that my flipping this scene creates distortion favoring a 3-D shape and thereby trying to deflect some attention and perceived validity away from this particular evidence, anyone doing the same in a graphics software program will quickly be able to confirm for themselves that this process has no visual impact of the object's integrity as evidence in any way. Further, if still not convinced, merely click on this M15-01271 link (same strip is in the list of wide-angle strip links above) and that will take you to an official image already with this same orientation at the left edge of that strip. I chose to use my flipped version here rather than the M15-01271 official image because this one provides a direct comparison with the other images also presented here and it also provides a overhead view of the animal monument not demonstrated in the M15-01271 strip. The views of the head are the same.
Now I've included the above fifth image of the same site but taken from the decades old Viking imaging to demonstrate that all visuals of these colossal monuments have been removed and completely sanitized from the older Viking evidence. Believe me, we would normally and easily be able to see anything like the 12 mile across head monument in this imaging. Obviously intentional tampering is by far the most likely explanation for the complete absence of these colossal size objects. We know conclusively from the numerous MOC imaging as listed above that these colossal objects are there. Yet, we don't see them here in the Viking data. That's obviously because they have been completely covered up by the same image tampering that has here again also blotted out the river system in the background, just as in the MOC data.
The point is that this kind of obvious image tampering and sanitizing of evidence was alive and well at least as far back as the 1970s. That tells us a great deal about the long term existence of this kind of image evidence manipulation and the serious degree of commitment someone has to this secrecy. Only a commonly felt fear reaction could generate this consistent degree of secrecy commitment among so many for so long. It also tells us that science communities, in being unable to recognize the presence of this manipulation of evidence and disentangle themselves from the false illusion it creates, have proven themselves ineffectual in the face of this subtle manipulation and are obviously completely taken in by it. So my advise is don't be looking in that direction for any leadership objective qualities you may be hoping for from well established and accepted "experts."
Obviously and logically, the secrecy types would not go to this much trouble to sanitize natural geology, rocks, etc. or even old civilization ruins from this Viking evidence record. The only thing important enough to warrant spending millions of our tax dollars on doing this and doing so at risk in secrecy is active live civilization evidence that in turn generates strong security issues. The fact that this civilization evidence is artificially sanitized from the Viking data decades ago logically demonstrates a fully sustained long term determination to maintain secrecy and only maximum security issues could warrant such a sustained all important commitment. In fact, just the secrecy alone demonstrates that the anomalous evidence presented here in this report and others is true civilization evidence on another world rather than chance ground terrain configurations or camera artifacts and that someone at the top level is well aware of this and takes it very seriously, even if some of us out here in the public and professions prefer not to.
Even though I think that some of you may now see the truth of the tampering, note how very natural looking the areas of the now missing monuments are in the Viking image as pointed out by the yellow arrows and text labels. Except for the crude river system blot type tampering, you can't see the tampering very much at all now can you? Looks quite natural doesn't it. That's because this successful dithering type of smudge tampering application has been done at resolutions far closer than that released to us. If we could see this scene in that much closer resolution imaging, we would be able to see the tampering application areas and determine their boundary lines. However, when drawn back to this much lesser resolution as released to the public, the tampering areas and the natural terrain simply blend in together so that the tampering evidence itself is obscured enough with few the wiser.
Make no mistake about it, what the above fifth image evidence from the Viking data tells us is that image tampering was alive and well at least in the 1970s and that someone has known about this civilization evidence issue at least since that time decades ago. Worse, it tells us that the scientific communities have not picked up on this manipulation and obfuscation of truth to any reasonable degree in all those decades. Since all these highly educated people, including many not career bound to official leadership sources, cannot be considered ignorant in order to adequately explain this, then it can only logically be explained by paradigm blindness mindset generating psychological rejection allowing only "acceptable" evidence to filter through to perception and consciousness.
This kind of speculation is further reinforced by a lot of standing liquid surface water evidence being allowed to be reasonably seen in the MOC science data in order to facilitate discovery. With the MOC data release including subsequent newer data from even newer probes, there has been a reluctant but slow steady trend toward loosening up the secrecy surrounding water (but not civilization evidence) on Mars. They know well that ambitious independent probes to Mars are happening and eventually revelations from independent research like that will be the end of this particular kind of secrecy. Therefore there must be an active strategy in place to deal with this eventuality well ahead of that time. In other words, you either get out on the leading edge of the inevitable wave and ride it trying to influence it or you just resist it and get abused by it as it rolls over and past you leaving you and your agendas in the lurch.
Yet, apparently almost no one can find the water or at least accept it as water when it is found. The secrecy types may not have anticipated just how deeply effective this paradigm mindset they so actively helped create is entrenched once established and deeply affecting subsequent generations. This is a clear testament to the effectiveness of the secrecy effort that likely not only filtered and manipulated key science data as it came through their hands but also manipulated our human perceptions on many much more fundamental and subtle psychological levels. Unfortunately, it is also a clear testament to the susceptibility of scientists, the media, the bulk of the government, and ourselves in the public to this kind of subtle mass manipulation to.
The secrecy agenda simply capitalizes on the human tendency and weakness to avoid facing admission that those they've chosen to place trust in (or perhaps I should say abdicated responsibility to) would be so independent and manipulative or that we could in turn be so easily manipulated. This kind of contemplation brings up disturbing and discomforting feelings of powerlessness and ignorance that no one never likes to face or deal with and will avoid if at all possible.
At the end of the day, we each have to make up our own minds as individuals rather than waiting on leaders to tell us how to think and what to do. Do we decide to deal with unsettling truth or remain satisfied with the perceived comfort of a false dream world of our own making reinforced with a little help from our friends?
SUMMARY POINTS:
(1) ... Artificial created colossi confirm powerful monumental civilization evidence on Mars.
(2) ... Numerous MOC strips reconfirm the existence of this evidence in this Mars region.
(3) ... This monumental civilization evidence may represent a governmental seat of power.
(4) ... This civilization evidence has clearly been intentionally sanitized from the old Viking data.
(5) ... Being important enough to be sanitized from the Viking data confirms it as civilization evidence.
(6) ... Viking data clearly confirms image tampering existence at least back into the 1970s.
(7) ... Viking image tampering confirms Mars civilization knowledge at least back into the 1970s.
DOCUMENTATION:
To check behind me in verifying this evidence in the official science data, the easiest to access is at the MSSS links below. Remember that the civilization evidence presented here comes from region wide context imaging with generally lesser resolutions appropriate to wide-angle imaging as opposed to narrow-angle strip imaging with its closer resolutions.
This http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/ab1_m04/images/M0200164.html link accesses the MGS MOC official M02-00164 wide-angle strip. Note that all three available strips work and all have the same orientation. The first listed lesser quality but faster loading sinusoidal (angled) strip will work just fine for convenience in verifying this evidence behind me. However, use the third listed better quality but slower loading straight GIF strip same as I used to do zoom in and clarify work, if that is your goal.
This http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/fullres/context/m03003/m0300324_gr.jpg link accesses the official Viking reference image for the site represented in my fifth report image. Remember that, like most of the older Viking images, this is a mosaic of a number of images spliced together representing the technology level of the 1970s. As such, artificial artifacts can be seen in some of this imaging including that created by the splicing process and one must be careful to differentiate between these artifacts and true terrain as well as not confuse such artifacts with image tampering. Also, be aware that connection to this page link may sometimes have to be attempted several times to get it to work properly on this government server, so don't be put off if you first get a message back that the page cannot be found. Just try again.
, Investigator
