MOON TOWER EVIDENCE
Report #067
May 12, 2004 (documentation replaced 2/13/2010)
This type of evidence reporting may be
disturbing to some, not because of the evidence itself so much as because
of its implications. After all, this evidence isn't on what we consider to
be some distant remote planet like Mars but on the Moon close to us hanging
right over our heads every night. A place that we consider as ours and to
be dead and without active current life. If you have strong feelings in this
regard, perhaps you should consider not getting into this report and its evidence
because this may burst a bubble.
With that said, the above first image, as are all the rest here, is taken
directly from the 1994 Navy Clementine military official science data and
shown above at standard official resolution demonstrating two massive left
and right towering objects in the terrain. Although blur and smudge tampering
applications have completely covered up these objects so that no specific
details of their true structure can actually be directly seen, that doesn't
mean that there isn't plenty here to interpret and learn from.
We are fortunate that the 1994 tampering applications stage of development
mapped and tightly conformed to each of these huge object's individual shape
in a different digital layer rather than more effectively blending that shape
out against and into the background terrain in a single layer as is more typical
of the later MGS MOC imaging. The net effect of this is that we can still
tell that these are most likely massive very tall vertical towering structures
that dwarf by far anything else in the terrain around it. The objects wider
base footprint tapering to a narrower form as it goes up to the more slender
top is typical of a very tall skyscraper building forms here on Earth. However,
these on the Moon are much more massive and far taller than anything here
on Earth, no doubt enabled by the Moon's much lower gravity.
Now note right off that these objects do not cast a shadow and that might
at first impression lead one to consider that this may be a tapering shaped
strip of blur/smudge tampering horizontally oriented on the ground and not
covering a tall vertical object. However, the terrain all around these towers
where a shadow might be have been has been subjected to smudge color coordinated
object specific image tampering applications done at much closer resolutions
than officially released. As I have stated a number of times, the mapping
type tampering applications map around normal size evidence at much closer
resolutions never released to the public and then the distancing technique
added produces the tiny looking geometric rectangular structures you will
see here that this terrain is absolutely full of around and nearby these immense
structures.
The mapping to individual objects process leaves out the light reflective
tops of normal size rectangular structures and creates the many rectangular
tiny specks you see in this terrain at the official resolution that is released
to the public. If you will look very close, take special note of these prominent
specks in the terrain to the immediate left of the base of the left tower
and note that they are for the most part rectangular shaped. These tampering
applications in the terrain have also in the process broken up and covered
up the shadows of these towers along with just about everything else natural
or artificial in the surface topography except for the reflective tops of
rectangular structures. With long straight linear lines at the edges, the
dark very long shadows that would be expected to be thrown by these objects
would fall well within the automated software's geometric programming profiles
and be candidates for cover up applications.
When this close resolution stage of the tampering work is done, the imaging
is then drawn back to a more distant view leaving the software having only
to map to the tower objects in a separate digital layer. The color coordinated
(with the terrain) blur/smudge tampering is applied to the towers. Once these
largest of all structures are covered up, then the view is again drawn back
to an even more distant and final level providing the official view seen above
as released to the public. This much distancing away from the true much closer
image resolution reduces anything normal size to something very distant and
tiny as you see here at official resolution where original shapes tend to
merge together forming new false shapes.
This distancing tampering technique works well with normal size now reduced
to very tiny size evidence but, even heavily covered up by blur/smudge tampering,
the massive towers dominating the terrain are still far too large, still too
prominent, and still too noticeable. So they then cause the imaging to be
generally substantially out of focus and it is also darkened a bit.
If questioned on this particular obfuscation technique, you can bet that their
misdirection defense would no doubt be to point out that this is albedo tuned
Clementine Moon imaging designed to capture color reflectivity and differentiation
and not designed to enhanced ground based object sharpness and detail. Of
course such a explanation would ignore the fact that some simple enhancements
by me are able to RETURN the image to a level of resolution closer to its
original sharpness just as you see here in my imaging and thereby substantially
improve the view. Obviously, if the original sharpness wasn't there in the
image to start with, I could not have done this. That fact demonstrates that
the original sharpness of the image has been degraded. That is unless you
accept that the best military imaging specialists in the world able to count
the warts on a bald headed terrorist's noggin from a distant satellite view
(okay a slight exaggeration) are consistently incompetent in image after image
in the tens of thousands of the Clementine Moon.
The combination of all these different types of image tampering effectively
leaves even the immense towers vague appearing and harder to see and differentiate
from the terrain they sit in. Yelp, you guessed it, that describes the resolution
situation of the Clementine official data as released to the public and for
research. So, if you are inclined to look at the official imaging for yourself
to check behind me and verify the evidence and its details as appears in my
imaging here, remember that I have done clarifying work to defeat some of
these obfuscation tactics. So be prepared to have some graphics software at
hand and use it if you desire to bring this evidence out of the darkness and
sharpen up its official fuzzy quality to match the clarity of my images here.
As evidence of these tampering applications destroying shadows, I draw your
attention to the small crater and its interior shadow to the immediate right
of the top of the right tower and then note the small crater a little further
to the left even with the top of the right tower in the above first image.
If real and not themselves tampered with (possible), these two small craters
demonstrate the sun angle and the position of legitimate interior shadows
on the crater floors. Now look around at the other craters and you will seen
that in varying degrees they do not demonstrate this sharp shadow effect,
even though they as craters theoretically should.
That's because they are generally larger, have broader surface interiors apparently
providing more room for development of content in them needing obfuscation
administrations and therefore have been the recipient of a lot of tampering
smudge applications. This out right destroys or at the very least compromises
the visuals of shadows cast on the near side interior by the raised crater
rims along with the rim and everything else, including any artificiality or
natural geological topography evidence.
I could have shown these tampering applications better here by darkening the
scene and zooming in more but this would have come at the expense of clarity
on the towers main evidence and I ran out of image room in this report for
any additional imaging. In fact, all the images in this report are seeing
a lot of ground level detail typical of tampering masked civilization evidence
making each image file size larger than normal and six of them are pushing
the envelope and have bogged down this report's loading speed considerably.
I am sorry about that but it couldn't be helped.
The above second image offers a split screen
view showing the two towers much closer or rather the blur/smudge tampering
covering them. At the very minimum, the mere presence of this blur treatment
covering something this large and massive on the Moon's surface should be
a real eye opener for even the most hardened skeptic. Even if you can't accept
my take of what this evidence logically appears to be, you have to ask yourself,
what could there possibly be about the supposedly airless no gravity dead
lonely Moon's geological surface that could warrant these highly object specific
very clear image tampering treatments on such a scale???
Make no mistake about it, you are looking directly at evidence of censorship
and by the military, not just the usual manipulations of NASA/JPL and company.
The military is in absolute control of the Clementine Moon mission from beginning
to end and you can bet that what ever is under this tampering is as top secret
as it gets in our society. To clarify in your mind just how much in control
of this particular Clementine mission the military is from the DOD (Department
of Defense) on down, reread my previous report #066 titled "The
Clandestine Moon: An Overview" for some enlightenment.
However, as obvious and highly dramatic as this massive very tall structures
evidence is, it is not the only important evidence here. Now these scenes
have been over lightened a bit from the darker originals to give you the best
view of these immense tall objects but this came at the expense of the much
smaller evidence detail and that's what I want you to consider now.
In the above second image and in the left split screen frame, please look
close and note the area in the terrain to the immediate left of the base of
the left tower structure. The color coordinated smooth surface featureless
smudge tampering application coatings there tightly hugging the terrain should
be obvious to many of you. You can see how this both covers over almost everything
but also leaves portions, particularly top portions (roofs) of some of the
tiny rectangular structures out in the midst of the application. When drawn
back to the official distant resolution as evidenced in my first image above,
these just look like simple specks in clarity enhanced imaging. Likewise,
when viewed in the official resolution with its fuzziness and darker quality,
these are often not even visible even as tiny specks and only as a vague terrain
texture that breaks up the smooth featurelessness of the applications.
This is how what we would consider normal size civilization evidence is hidden.
This is how tower shadows and crater interior shadows are visually compromised,
broken up, and/or destroyed. This is how color coordination is mapped into
the terrain on the back of this mapped coating done at many times closer resolutions
than seen here. This is how the visuals of real natural geological surface
details are compromised or destroyed substituting false illusionary detail.
This also how visual frame of reference surface objects are compromised that
might tip one off as to what the true distance/scale is as opposed to what
we are being conned into believing exists in any view.
Once you understand how these manipulations are done, then you begin to realize
that the view is much more distant that you are led to believe by the official
statistics and that these tiny rectangular structures are really what we would
consider normal size objects, just seen very distantly via artificial manipulation.
For example, one of those tiny rectangular objects you see in the midst of
that tampering to the left of the base of the left tower is actually the size
of a very large long multistory commercial building. Once you understand that
and the real scale here in this scene, you begin to realize that the vertical
artificial tower (assuming it is that) is actually incredibly massive, super
tall, colossal in scale, and well beyond the size of any vertical structure
seen here on Earth.
The above third image demonstrates yet
more very obvious tower evidence but in a different location. This new and
different site is actually nearby and to the right or east of the site of
the two towers in my first and second images here. The massive structures
in my first and second images are very similar to each other in their super
tall tapered shape but here the left tower is very similar to the first two
but the two towers to the right in this scene are a bit shorter, more blocky
in appearance, and a bit more massive. The collection of green arrows point
out some of the most obvious but not all of the civilization evidence in this
scene.
The tampering covered up massive structures are very obvious but also note
the great number of rectangular tiny specks located all around in this scene.
Many of these are tops of geometric structures sticking out of the smudge
tampering applications but you will also see a good many tiny rectangular
structures sitting in the landscape not covered up by the tampering. Scale
wise this is what we might consider normal size civilization evidence, just
seen very tiny because of the use of the distancing technique. It is this
very telling smaller size evidence that provides us with insight into the
true size scale here and gives us a more accurate perception of the colossal
size of the dominating massive structures.
Pay special attention to the large shallow appearing crater in the background
landscape behind the towers. It is shallow appearing only because the mid
and rear areas are covered up by heavy darker smudge image tampering applications
that have obliterated the side and rear crater rims blending these areas into
the general surrounding terrain and creating the illusion of not much depression
depth. The near foreground rim in the dark narrow band area has also been
broken up by tampering applications but, although thick, these applications
are a little more spotty there and there is just so much small geometric structure
evidence concentrated in this band and much of it can be seen better in the
closer imaging in the next two images below.
The above fourth image demonstrates a closer
view of the scene in the left field of my third image. As you can see, the
blur/smudge tampering covering up the largest most massive vertical structures
is clear and very obvious standing out very sharply in the terrain. Note the
long narrow horizontal band of tampering application extending out left and
right from the base of the taller tower on the left and in the background
behind the right tower hiding something lower profile and long in the terrain.
Just as important, please note the few small but still clearly seen rectangular
geometric structures evidence in the terrain out in the foreground in front
of the left tower and to the left of the right tower that the direct tampering
applications missed. Now look at the small geometric structure evidence thick
in the dark area at the top of the image. Small but very telling evidence
and it is all over this general scene.
The above fifth image is a closer view
of the right field of view in my third image. Note the obvious massive but
lower profile (relative to the tallest towers) structure hidden by the blur/smudge
tampering application near the right side of the image. It dominates everything
but this scene is more important because it has some of the most and the best
small structure evidence in it.
Get close to the computer screen and look very close at the many geometric
small structures in the darker area near the top of the image. Many have dark
black narrow runs of tampering on them to break up their visuals and run them
together but some individual geometric structures can still be clearly seen
to, especially the reflective roof tops. This is very powerful artificiality
evidence and right on the Moon hanging over our heads every night. Note to
that this evidence significantly appears to be in the open and not under protective
covers.
However, this imaging does not allow a conclusive determination as to whether
any of this artificiality evidence is active or long dead or abandoned. But,
if you can accept any of this evidence at all and before some start choosing
to believe that this must be dead or abandoned evidence, consider why there
have been no human return visits to the Moon in over three decades since the
initial flurry of the 1960s and 1970s? That clearly amounts to avoiding the
Moon and instead concentrating on space stations closer to home in the intervening
decades.
Also, why the refusal to have Hubble close image the Moon? That to clearly
amounts to avoidance as well. Why the determined resistance in spite of pressure
from scientists in this regard? Think about it! If there were long dead and/or
abandoned sophisticated structures on the Moon on the large scale you see
here, there would have been secrecy but also a mad scramble to access them
and their knowledge potential as quickly as possible. That this appears not
to have happened is significant evidence in its own right.
Likewise, some might want to suspect that we are already on the Moon and the
mostly hidden civilization evidence seen here is only evidence of our being
there and that is the secret being hidden. Well we might be there but I doubt
it. Either way, the civilization evidence seen here is too much and far beyond
what could have been accomplished in secret on the Moon by Earth humans in
the last few decades. It clearly represents the presence, past and/or present,
of someone else on "our" Moon.
The most likely scenario is that early Moon exploration discovered something
there that has caused us to keep our distance for decades and this is the
secret that is being maintained. Why? Very likely because there is little
to nothing we can do about it. This has no doubt had its impact on our exploration
of Mars as well with a similar result. Non intrusive observation devises may
be permitted but not anything more intrusive than that and that is why the
only missions to the Moon and Mars since then have been in the form of lower
profile fairly covert surveillance technology and why manned missions have
been so determinedly resisted.
Some skeptics in denial may want to talk about these many geometric forms
being the result of over pixelation of the images. If so, all you have to
do is look at the smoother featureless and a bit lumpy (conforming/mapping
to what they cover up) tampering application surfaces and edges and note that
you see absolutely no pixelation in these spots such as on the towers. Pixelation
is the result of zooming in too much so that the underlying square pixel grid
is blown up too much and starts introducing blocky patterns all over the image.
If this was truly happening, then that blocky pattern influence would be demonstrated
all over the image, not just in the parts of it demonstrating geometric structures.
That this is not the case, is very telling. Further, anyone with graphics
software can prove to themselves that pixelation is not a factor by simply
increasingly zooming in on the original official image. When you reach the
zoom factor matching what I have on the evidence (always stated), you will
see no pixelation on the evidence. But, if you zoom further beyond that point,
true pixelation blocky patterns will gradually begin to appear. The point
is that pixelation happens only beyond the point of my zoom factors confirming
that pixelation by me is not a factor in my imaging.
The above sixth image demonstrates a mosaic
image section clearly inserted into the overall image. The presence of this
insert and its relation to the other evidence can be seen at the top of my
third image here in this report.
Note that, just as I pointed out in my older report #054 titled "Viking
Tampering Evidence," the insert stands out so sharply in this
terrain because the image tampering applications are different in this mosaic
piece than the others surrounding it. The terrain outside the insert has a
great deal of color coordinated tampering applications in it such as the more
evident carpeting treatments in the large crater in the left bottom area of
the above image that created the shallow crater illusion at the back of the
crater. However, within the insert area there are a lot of very dark color
tampering applications. The result is the strong contrast between the two
different tampering fields drawing attention to the insert and its straight
perimeter demarcation lines.
Most of the small civilization evidence within the image insert area has been
obliterated by the very dark tampering leaving only the smallest of all evidence
out of it and that located in high albedo (reflective) areas which tends to
obscure it. However, even though very small due to the distance tampering,
the tiny evidence left out of the tampering, some of which is pointed out
by the green arrows, still clearly appears to be lower profile rectangular
geometric structure evidence strongly suggestive of artificiality and buildings.
You should be aware that the official images the evidence in this report is
drawn from are located in the upper northern latitudes near but not in the
North Polar Region. The satellite/camera orbital path from south to north
generally conforms to the curve of the Moon's surface over most of its passage
but begins in its elliptical orbit to be further away from the surface as
it approaches the poles. This starts occurring right at this mosaic image
insert point and its camera shots of the surface at this point begin to be
further away from the surface and more angled. This distancing and widening
of the view taking in more of the curvature of the Moon away from the camera
also tends to stretch the image. The Moon topography at and just above this
insert's location starts to show this effect. Above this point, viewable detail
very rapidly degrades and distorts with distance and this stretching effect.
CONCLUSION
I suspect that some of you have strong fairly entrenched assumptions
about what is acceptable to be considering as being on or not being on the
Moon. After all, generations have grown up thinking of the Moon a certain
way and that it is a dead airless place inhospitable to life as we know it
and the only way human life as we know it could live there is in protected
and even armored environments on the surface or underground.
If thought about at all, this concept is so deeply entrenched in the public
psychology and reinforced by a perception of familiarity with the Moon (warranted
or not), that evidence such as you see here is probably going to be perceived
by some as too fantastic and perhaps even too disturbing and therefore rejected
emotionally as outright impossible. The fact that the smaller evidence that
we can also see here appears to be out in the open and not protected by traditional
barriers (that we can see or might be familiar with) appears to fly impossibly
in the face of our belief systems and what we might think we should expect
of the supposedly airless Moon, also tends to reinforce the concept that this
evidence is impossible.
Yet, the visual hard evidence presented here is implacably what it is. Further,
it is readily verifiable in the official data by anyone who cares to go to
the trouble of checking it behind me via the links provided below and supported
by that data. Just remember, I do not in any way make this evidence, only
present it as it is found, so don't blame the messenger if you see something
here you don't like and find disturbing in its implications and possibilities.
As you can see in the hard visual evidence here, it is clearly an inescapable
fact that there are massively large objects or areas on the Moon's surface
being intentionally visually hidden from our view by image tampering applications.
Clearly someone here on Earth is doing this and definitely knows the truth!
Beyond that identifying what is being hidden beneath the tampering is admittedly
speculation but that speculation can also be based on logic and reason to
and therefore still informative and worthy of exploring.
Clearly, the military logically would not be hiding natural rock/sediment
topography as that would simply not be worthy of such secrecy obfuscation
treatments and can be ruled out. So what else is there? By the process of
elimination, based on the question of what would be worthy of such treatments,
the obvious implication is that these are artificial structures of some kind
and therefore most probably represent civilization evidence. The small rectangular
geometric evidence in the terrain around and nearby these massive objects
that are not completely hidden by the image tampering applications also reinforces
this concept. Additionally, the mere presence itself of the considerable image
tampering mapping to and covering up most of this evidence also reinforces
this concept. Obviously, where there is smoke, there is also of course probably
fire.
If someone else does have a long term entrenched presence on "our"
Moon so close every night over our heads with all of its implications, including
how they be interacting with us and who has a right to what, then this is
our truth and reality whether we are willing to admit it or not or face it
or not. Personal denial and pretense changes nothing at all and only perpetuates
self ignorance and that in turn increases the risk of an unfortunate unprepared
for outcome as reality goes on relentlessly about its business. We have to
wake up to the real world that we already live in and learn to effectively
deal with it if we are ever to be worthy of our own self respect and stand
on equal footing with peers we didn't even know we had.
At the very minimum, the crystal clear and undeniable tampering hard visual
evidence seen here on such a large scale mapping to such sharply defined specific
points of the Moon's surface topography tells us absolutely conclusively that
there is a large secrecy agenda in existence within our space exploration
programs, someone here is clearly involved, and it represents some kind of
truth that is big and important enough to be actively hidden from the public
and taxpayers who pay the freight that enables the very endeavors that produce
this evidence and who own it.
Maybe some of you will not agree but I think this situation is wrong, increasingly
risky, and a situation requiring correction. If we need to grow up some in
the process, then so be it. What do you think? Do you really want to know?
Can you handle the truth I suspect many of you already sense and logically
anticipate? Are you ready to move on psychologically into a new age of increased
complexity that appears to possibly be already upon us?
DOCUMENTATION (replaced
2/13/2010)
The military's Clementine Lunar Browser (CLIB) version
1.5 has been "retired" and the new "improved" version
2.0 data that replaces it now conveniently (for secrecy) does not contain
the discovery evidence presented here in this report and it appears that those
former discovery sites have been altered in the 2.0 data to sanitize them
away. Therefore, to facilitate verification and prove that the anomalous discoveries
were in fact in the older 1.5 science data and part of it for 16 years, the
links immediately below access the unaltered version 1.5 originals downloaded
by this researcher in 2004 and now parked on this website.
Report 1st & 2nd source image from
the 1.5 data
Report 3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th source
image from the 1.5 data
Since the general terrain around these discovery sites can still be identified
in the new 2.0 data despite changes, you can compare the old 1.5 versus the
new 2.0 sites and see the sanitization for yourself. Even though this may
be historically consistent with past secrecy treatment of anomalous Moon evidence,
I see this foolishness 16 years later military move targeting these anomalous
discoveries as particularly offensive, arrogant, and of very poor judgment.
Worse it demonstrates a serious disconnect with and disregard for the American
people who paid for this and who's sole property it is. However, you must
decide for yourself.
http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/clib:
This link accesses the Clementine Lunar Image Browser
(CLIB) version 2.0 noting that version 1.5 data
is now no longer available. There one can search the official military Clementine
science data based via either the graphical interface or Moon latitude and
longitude coordinates. When using those coordinates below highlighted in green,
just enter them in the appropriate coordinate boxes and hit your return or
enter key.
REPORT 1st & 2nd IMAGES:
At the above link on the form provided enter 64
in the Latitude box and 265 in the Longitude
box and then hit your "Enter" key to access the same evidence site
as in the version 1.5 data and to confirm the sanitizing.
REPORT 3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th IMAGES: At the
above link on the form provided enter 70
in the Latitude box and 240 in the Longitude
box and then hit your "Enter" key to access the same evidence site
as in the version 1.5 data and to confirm the sanitizing.
, Investigator
