CURiOSITY & TRUTH?
Report #227
May 10, 2013
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16204
Believe it or not, in the above image
shown just a presented by NASA and with no graphics work in it by me, there
is very strong anomalous life evidence of mammal life. The question is it
of life on Mars similar to that here on Earth encountered by the Curiosity
rover on Mars Sol 52 or, alternatively, is it proof that someone has been
messing around with the imaging and managed to miss something very important,
something revealing what is really going on with the Curiosity imaging.
What I want you to do is find the anomalous evidence for yourself in the above
first image. Do it without cheating (by looking at other images below) and
in the process demonstrate to yourself just how difficult the evidence is
to detect even with clues, when in plain sight, and therefore just how easy
it would be for even image graphics specialists in trying to manipulate the
image content to miss something like this and then later get caught up by
it.
This image evidence was brought to my attention by viewer Monte Williams months
ago 1n 2012 via email during a time just before my recent injury. In fact
it was during a time when I was just too overwhelmed with work to pay enough
attention to every thing and so I rejected it initially after the briefest
of looks. Fortunately, rather than being offended as he had a right to be,
Monte quitely persisted. His polite but insistent approach persuading me to
look again more carefully and this time the evidence immediately leaped out
at me I'm happy to say and now here I am sharing it with you.
The truth is that I just wasn't expecting anything in the Curosity imaging
to be so clear and obvious and this likely effected my initial judgement or
lack of it. Often, even with researchers like me that try to keep an open
mind, what one is able to see is initially often affected by one's expectations.
When one doesn't expect much, one is frequently not disappointed.
Understandably impatient in fooling around with mental foot draggers like
me, he presented it himself and persuaded a few other websites to also present
it, so you may have already seen this elsewhere. Even so, it's still worth
looking at again just as I did. It's just too important in its implications
to forget.
After all, if it is as it so oviously appears to be, it is either proof of
common every day Earth type life on Mars or proof that someone substituted
Earth terrain in this graphics image and just slipped up by not noticing two
Earth mammals (clue) taking a rest in it blending in with the rocks. Remember,
your tax dollars paid for this. It is your property and it is for you to decide
whether this evidence is important or not and not a bunch of scientist wowed
into a compliant psychology by NASA and JPL and the opportunity to work on
this and future high profile space programs.
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16204
The above 2nd image shows the location
of the evidence in question pointed out by my yellow arrows and within the
yellow outline box. The yellow arrow on the right also points out what at
first looks very much like a huge prehistoric Earth megladon shark fossil
tooth. However, closer inspection reveals that this is more likely to be just
a rock that happens to take this particular shape.
That's the way of many items that at first look like good evidence but upon
closer inspection begin to loose the look that brought on the increased attention.
In any case, take note of what looks to be a rodent of some kind within the
yellow box outline on the left. Further, it looks more and more like that
type of evidence of life the closer one examines it. Note the following image
with the Mars Curosity evidence on the left and Earth evidence for comparison
on the right.
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA16204
http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/giant-hamster
http://www.allcampgrounds.com/blog/?p=446
As you can see in the above 3rd split
screen image, zooming in on the rodent at 200% and 250% in a .tif image not
only increases its look as a living organic life form, it also reveals that
the main creature evidence with the tell tale eye may not be alone. On the
main evidence object note the dark open eye and the lighter color hairs immediately
over and around the eye subtly framing it and forming an eye brow, then note
the same surrounding eye detail and the same fur color features on the Earth
Capybara I've included for comparison in the upper right split screen
of this third image. This evidence may be cute and cuddly looking but it it
also heady powerful stuff!
The lower left Curiosity 250% zoom image reveals that the main evidence object
does in fact appear to be a rodent like creature covered in light shaded fur.
Note that I've also included the similar image of the Earth
Prairie Dog family in the lower right split screen.
Unfortunately, although the general size and body build of the Praire Dogs
as you can see is comparable, it appears that this image was taken here on
Earth using a color filter that artificially rendered the creatures and
their environment with a similar universal tan color or someone did
this in processing the image.
Now go back to the 250% main evidence image on the lower left. In it note
that there is a white rock just partially visible in the background close
on the opposite side of the main creature with the view partially blocked
by it and as seen just over its back and rear. Also, via identification of
proximity and fur shading, it appears that there may be a second animal of
the same type with its back and left side exposed to us laying there in a
curved shape and with its rear legs in a hole or depression. This second creature's
fur clad body is blocking the view of the right rear quarter of the main animal.
No head or legs of the second creature are visible but the fur clad shape
of it and swelling at the appropriate places with its rear basically toward
us suggests that these features would be present and that this is in fact
a companion animal.
I think that at least the main visual evidence is so strong as to warrant
our assumption that what we are looking at is at least one living mammal rodent
like creature with an open eye here in this imaging. If we can accept that
this is a fur clad rodent, the question then becomes whether this evidence
is really on another distant world like Mars or something from Earth manipulated
into the Curiosity imaging and missed by those who would do such manipulation?
Now you begin to see why I demonstrated how it isn't easy to see this evidence
and how easy it is to miss even with hints one as to its presence.
What is easier to do is fool people who just can't bring themselves to really
suspect and thereby question the presence of manipulation starting with some
of the legitimate Curiosity team scientists. Planning and getting the Curiosity
rover to Mars, landing it safely, exploring the Mars surface, and analyzing
the results is a very large and complicated task to undertake. To be efficient
such tasking requires specializing and compartmentalization and a great deal
of commitment. The scientists and engineers in the teams deserve a lot of
credit for a job well done and my hat, if I had one, is off to them in this
regard. This solid accomplishment is something that we all need to not overlook
and acknowledge.
However, larger compartmentalized projects that benefit so much from specialization
are also projects within which much can be hidden within the increased complexity
and particularly where so many instruments are involved and where everyone
accepts what they've been told at official upper levels. For example, a data
package of images from 17 cameras can be broadcast to Earth and received in
secret by Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs under secret encryption and,
if the programming is up to it, processed quickly by the AI's working much
faster than humans to be sent back and rebroadcast to Earth with the correct
encryption expected by the participating scientists. The latter having no
reason to be suspicious or to question (from their point
of view) simply would not be any the wiser thinking they were receiving
original raw data that would then go to their own people for processing.
It's a case of secrets within secrets. The first surface level of secrets
are of course those kept for National Security reasons from known adversaries
and those hoping to profit from industrial espionage, etc. I think most of
us can understand and accept this necessity. A routine example would be the
obscuring smudge that is always routinely mapped to the individual solar cells
hiding their labeling since day one on all the rovers sent to Mars. This eliminates
the labels on the no doubt enhanced solar cells and in theory inhibits their
identify from being known and replicated by others.
It always amazes me that so many people that shouldn't be are surprised to
have their perception stuck in this and especially to the obvious concept
that this kind of very precise mapping and obfuscation applications by AI's
can target other scenes in an image both on a rover and in its surrounding
terrain. In the various wars in the Mid-East where vehicles traveling at speed
down battleground roadways routinely have the road shoulders closest to the
vehicles smudged out in theory to prevent accidental views by the public of
the roadside carnage that could slip through.
However, then the secrecy can also drill down into many more levels far below
that required by necessity. In other words, the real anomalous information
as to what ever is on Mars (or elsewhere) that is worthy of secrecy by someone's
definition resides with the AI's who never talk or reveal anything unless
it is to those select few that have command structure access to them. In other
words, if you are a legitimate scientist on the MSL Curiosity team, you could
be resting your morning cup of coffee unknowingly on top of a massive anomalous
covered up data dump and never even know it.
It is also not my intention here to take away from a discovery of animal life
on Mars and that to may be what this is. On the other hand and as I have been
warning in my reporting, I've anticipated that the image tampering technology
will have brought the secrecy types to the point that they could feel bold
enough to use it to full extent in the Curiosity imaging. That would take
many forms including the substitution of whole sections of Earth terrain into
the Mars imaging. The advantage to secrecy types is that true Mars terrain
is eliminated by this slight of hand and thereby the risk of missing something
on Mars too revealing in it. After all with thousands of objects in a single
Mars image, it is still all too easy for it to happen.
On the other hand, it is just as easy to miss something in the Earth substitution
imaging and then have to do the impossible and explain it likely as something
the public may regard as acceptable. That's the question here. Is the evidence
animal life we are looking at here in this imaging a substituion from Earth's
terrain missed by the secrecy types and not something real on Mars or is it
truly something real on Mars? If past performance is an indicastor, during
the last 12-13 years of my investigative reporting, much of the evidence I've
presented has so often shown:
(1) That consistent determined secrecy is deeply embedded
in and running space exploration.
(2) There is no hesitancy to use it to promote ignorance. Indeed, it seems
to have become the norm.
(3) That Mars does have surface water in a liquid state as well as vegetation
life taking advantage of it.
(4) That Mars with surface water and bio-life logically would have more advanced
forms of life as well.
It also seems fairly obvious that the secrecy types are simply unable to bring
themselves to spill the beans on themselves and take their lumps while they
can perhaps still afford to. The best they can seem to do is flirt around
with the most minimal revelations that water and life could have existed on
Mars in the ancient past even though so many
have moved on past that point as a given and it is simply no longer enough
to save them. Continuing to keep the mainstream in ignorance is a delaying
tactic that has just about completely worn out its effectiveness and welcome
with so many.
One day and probably soon secrecy will collapse and the truth will explode
too suddenly into mainstream awareness. The shock of it for those in the mainstream
unprepared will result in the extremes of denial, disillusionment, the fleeing
of trust, the anger, the retribution, and an end to protective isolationism
as others take the power from you. No aliens are going to provide you with
an excuse to divert attention away from yourself and, face it, any others
aren't going to let you manufacture any false flag scenarios to that end trying
to shift the blame away from yourself to others.
This is after all the bed of your making and you are going to have to lay
in it. Time has about run out. Change is nearly upon us. Either lead while
you can, take your lumps, and preserve what you can, or loose all and go the
way of the dinosaur and buggy whip.
In any case, here you have these rodents as hard visual evidence. They either
represent life on Mars or here on Earth with each possibility having its obvious
implications. My thoughts are that, since NASA and JPL appear to be ignoring
these rodents and not claiming them as life on Mars, then image manipulation
is the most likely explanation and they just hope it will go away in the mainstream's
mind again and that their stonewalling will continue to be successful.
, Investigator
