SECRECY: WHO'S RESPONSIBLE?

HOW CAN SO MANY NOT SEE?

Commentary #003

July 25, 2004

 

 

I receive e-mail from viewers putting forth some valid excellent points and asking some meaningful pointed questions. Below is such a e-mail with the viewer's identity kept confidential. His words verbatim below are very articulate, speak directly to an important issue in the pursuit of truth in this planetary evidence, and needs to be shared.

VIEWER COMMENTS:

Hi

After reading some of the material on your website marsanomalyresearch
(however lately it seems the subject tends to move towards our Moon) I was
wondering something.

First of all, I try to be open minded when reading and watching materials
like this and not to jump to conclusions or be prejudice. As a basis for my
opinions, thoughts or ideas I may have on subjects like this, all I can do
is try to use the common sense and such I posses (since I am no scientist
or astrologer).

You imply that the US government had tampered with a lot of the images you
use to analyze different phenomenons and sights. I could imagine this being
a possibility.

However, wondering on this I couldn't help stop to think how they could get
away with such grave censorship. Now maybe you have explained this in some
of your articles, but I haven't read everything (because there is so much
there).

My point is, especially with the Moon, the US government can't be the only
one being able to see as close at it as in the pictures. There have to be
at least thousands of amateur astrologers and several more advanced
academic institutes researching this. And probably lots of governments of
other country's. How come no one has ever said or implied anything similar
as to what you are saying about the tampering?

And shouldn't those people also be able to see the (buildings, structures,
etc) you say that exist on the Moon with their own telescopes or whatever
they use, or at least a part or glimpse of it?

I can't imagine all of these governments working together in a large
conspiracy, withholding information, as our nations are too much divided
for something like that I think. And if anyone would make accusations or
take this story into the mass media, there would a frenzy on the subject.
Or maybe I am just wrong.

Perhaps you can shed some light on this subject for me. Like I said I try
to be open minded are not accusing anyone of anything, I am just trying to
understand.

With kind regards,

MY COMMENTS:

Both your objectivity and your caution are applauded as is the intellect and common sense you demonstrate. In a world where there is far too often "spin" on information, whether coming from private sources or from more official sources, your apporach with caution tactis is sound. Meanwhile, let me make a couple of clarification point on behalf of myself.

First, the evidence I present is drawn from and verifiable in the official science data and I do not in any way make or manufacture the VISUAL evidence I present. What you see, what ever its ultimate ramifications, is exactly what is in the official science data. Verification that this is a reality that already exists in the official science data is encouraged as well as enabled and facilitated by me in each of my reports. So, to that extent, while it is hard objective evidence, it is a reality not to be confused with me, my views or interpretations.

On the other hand, as the original discoverer of just about all of the evidence I present, I do have my own interpretive opinion and do express it, as is my right in a democratic free society. In other words, my commentary is something that I do make. Likewise, because of some demonstrated skill on my part in finding and revealing such anomalous visual evidence where most others do not may suggest a measure of increased insight, so it may also be true that my comments on the evidence may influence some viewers who may agree with some of my interpretations. However, basically in the end, we must all individually come to our own conclusions as to this evidence record and its implications.

Second, let's be clear that I do not say that the US Government has tampered with the images, nor do I imply such a broad and reaching statement. Rather, because of my reporting exposure of this image tampering and its implications and the fact that it clearly exists itself as hard evidence in the official imaging as officially released to the science and academic communities as well as to the public through official channels and there is clear evidence of this as I have often presented, that reality quite apart from me does itself alone logically imply that "someone" of high status operating with complete and thorough access to the original raw science data is involved. However, that logical extrapolation should not be confused with me personally or with the Government as a whole.

The evidence obviously points in a clear logical direction. Because of that and my orientation on following where evidence leads, I of course have my own personal suspicions. However, even though I do have just as much right to speculate on such matters as anyone else, I do not normally do so. Why? Because I can't know for absolute certainty and have neither the resources or the inclination to prove anything in this regard. So expressing such specific speculatory opinions on my part would be a bit presumptuous.

The fact is that, in my opinion, who is the most active in docing this isn't nearly as important as ultimately recognizing that it is actually being done and that it exists at all. The latter is my focus. Once aware of this reality, then taking that into serious consideration with other more normal factors when evaluating the science data and drawing conclusions from it is essential to adequate understanding of planetary science data and evidence. So I normally refer to these types vaguely as the "secrecu tu[es" or the "secrecy agenda" becauce that is clearly a major product of their activities.

These types are certainly the initiators and continuing promoters and manipulators of secrecy. Their surface justification is that secrecy from potential adversaries is necessary and this is in fact a real concern in the real world. However, it is also a truth that another one of their main purposes is to promote secrecy from the very populations they are suppose to serve. When very many people become involved in any issue, the process of consensus begins to rear its ugly head. From the secrecy point of view, agreement by consensus among a great many divergent people is difficult to come by and, worse, any such consensus is likely to be more representative of the goals of the population and these are often not the goals of the secrecy types.

So, leadership and secrecy types often regard the prospect of populations and their consensus approach as being inefficient and counterproductive at the least and outright interference at the most. In other words, something to definitely be avoided and thus the need to make decisions in and operate in secrecy. Yet, when secrecy rules, the down side often is too much ignorance on the part of the whole and also to isolate the few from the many they are suppose to serve and represent so much so that critical decision making by the few often tends to evolve out of touch with the whole.

So, is the US Government leadership in general involved in and responsible for all this secrecy? I doubt that to any serious degree. Are certain elements of the Government, military, and private commercial interests at the highest levels in the USA as well as around the world involved? Assuming that the image tampering evidence does exist and it is protected and facilitated at the highest levels as clearly appears to be the case, that is a logical extrapolation from the image tampering evidence at hand and therefore a concept that is naturally formed needing no assistance from me. I merely articulate the obvious.

Human history here on Earth is replete with demonstrated evidence that the few, if they do not outright rule the many, do manipulate the many's perceptions of the world around them and primarily to the purposes and agendas of the few. Over time, populations become too used to and comfortable with this state of affairs, often even to the point of tolerating some serious excesses by the few. A most recent case in point, depending on your viewing perspective, is the invasion of Iraq and its historical public justifications.

Even when the few's actions are sometimes regarded as disturbing and unsettling and even investigated at high levels, the status quo still usually prevails and becomes increasingly the entrenched "norm" via natural population inertia and failure to demand change. This herd approach to things in turn tends to subdue the many doing any serious questioning of the few, their motives, or their agendas even when enemies of the secrecy few try to capitalize by whipping up emotional reactions and action by the many. Inertia is a powerful force. There are of course occasional exceptions to this but it holds true as a generality.

So, many individuals like you and I and others may want to know truth but the large populations we are a part of in general are often not much interested in knowing truths in an inescapable manner that might deviate a little too much from the perceived comfortable familiar norm and which may in turn cause them some concern and discomfort. Populations have historically often willingly abdicated responsibility to the few when it comes to primary decision making affecting their lives and the few in turn often capitalize on this psychology to their own ends.

This phenomena is just one aspect of human behavior, at least here on Earth. Whether it is a negative quality or a positive one or something in between is a matter we must each decide for ourselves. What it often does result in is manipulation being an accepted or at least tolerated norm. Some individuals in a population may question the norm quite a bit in their lone voices but normally not the mainstream whole unless things reach such a poor general state where they can't successfully ignore it and its consequences any longer.

With the manipulations of the few on one end of this spectrum and population abdication of responsibility at the other end, the great bulk of the middle and its inertia is formed by those who to varying degrees cooperate with the established norm regardless of whether they believe it to be right or wrong. In other words, they go along with the status quo rather than make waves and bring negative attention by the whole focused upon themselves. To be socially acceptable and not regarded negatively by the larger social body is also a strong powerful instinct and motivation in the human psychology.

So, when it comes to the satellite imaging tampering and censorship and secrecy associated with it or the acceptance of direct hard evidence of active intelligent life on other planetary bodies, no matter how obvious it may be, most people in the mainstream population whole just try to ignore it and go along with the current status quo. Consider the following break down of a whole population.

You have a few that are in the know loop directly and heavily involved in secrecy and manipulation on one end of the spectrum. Then you have a much larger body of people in the middle who may be a little more in the know to some limited extent than the average person but still intentionally go along with and directly supporting the socially acceptable perceived norm to preserve social acceptance and avoid the stress of change. Then you have the largest body of people in the middle forming the bulk of the population who frequently have no clue, often do not want to have a clue, are often generally apathetic, and who indirectly support the status quo of secrecy and censorship by just ignoring situations as long as they can forming the inertia and resistance to new information and change. Finally, you again a few at the other end of the spectrum who perceive much of the truth and raise their individual lone voices against illusion and for truth but who are generally ignored by the "mainstream" greater whole.

Trying to identify who is responsible for the secrecy is sort of like the old saying that all Chinese look alike to an American and vise versa. Obviously all Chinese and Americans do not look alike and are not alike even as seen from within their ranks must less as seen from without. So, just as it is inaccurate to try and lump everyone together just because they do share some similarities, it isn't as simple as identifying and placing responsibility on a tight knit group of insiders effectively cooperating with each other and actively conducting secrecy and censorship. The truth and reality is much more complex and divergent than that.

For example, amateur or professional scientists, satellite imaging experts, and researchers around the world are for the most part highly educated and trained people. What that also says is that most of these people came up through a highly organized and structured belief system that elevates the "norm" of what it perceives and believes to be true and mostly rejects anything else that deviates from that norm too much identifying it as "spurious" information. That means that they are heavily conditioned not only in their belief systems but also in the spurious rejection process. So, everything they are exposed to must come through that deeply entrenched two pronged perception system and is of course filtered by it.

There has been no room in their historical highly structured training, belief and conditioning system for the type of anomalous evidence seen here at this Web site even though it is coming out of their own official science data. To them it is just too fantastic, too incredible, and deviates just way too much from their accepted "norm" and is therefore quickly judged and treated as spurious information in an automatic knee jerk rejection reaction. This happens whether we are talking about seeing this material for the first time here at this Web site or encountering it on their own as they directly research the science data.

Yet, because we assume they have knowledge greater than our own, these highly trained people are often elevated by the public to positions as being our recognized "experts" in this field with the right "credentials" and therefore our "leadership" when it comes to planetary evidence and its interpretation. This in turn sets up what is acceptable perception wise and what is not for us in the public as we tend to view our environment through their perception and conditioning. Likewise, the various media that spread information into and condition populations in turn take their cues from these "experts" with their accepted "credentials." You see this process at work all the time in information pushed by news presentation organizations like CNN, BBC, etc. all around the world.

So if something is inaccurately regarded and portrayed as spurious information by these "experts" with their accepted "credentials" and conditioning, it is in turn likewise regarded as spurious information by the media that doesn't otherwise have a clue as to the real truth and is rejected for exposure to the public by them. It is in this way that so such information is censored and never passed on to the mainstream population via the traditional gateways. In other words, the media makes your decisions for you as to what you need to be exposed to. The net result is that legitimate knowledge and truth is often withheld and population ignorance is promoted. However, it isn't as though it's just as simple as an outright secrecy agenda plot, it is also enabled by cooperating general idiosyncratic human behavior.

The full blown active secrecy types are intelligent and are in powerful leadership and influential decision making capacities. They recognize this situation with the science and academic communities, the media, and the mainstream population as described here. It represents a tempting manipulation opportunity to them and so they do capitalize on it to promote their own goals and prevent interference with their agendas.

The answer to this isn't so much to try and convince the Leopard to change his spots, as that might be a little too much to expect from people who must legitimately deal with the clandestine aspects of the world. Rather, a more practical approach would perhaps be to demand significant numbers of individualistic people drawn from out of the population becoming more involved at both the information and highest decision making levels to provide some more desirable checks and balances and, at the very least, try and not leave such "opportunities" for manipulation laying around to tempt the secrecy types with.

In other words, if you don't want your car stolen, then don't be an accomplice to the event by forgetting and leaving your keys in the ignition while you run inside some establishment for just a minute or two. When a population as a whole drops the ball and becomes complicit, I suspect the secrecy types would counter by asking what right do we then have in saying who picks up the ball and runs with it and where?

The secrecy agenda types of course are much at fault because they do actively infiltrate strategic positions in government and those science entities directly associated with space exploration thereby controlling the information flow there and manipulating the decision making. They also infiltrate the root academic systems that train, condition and produce the science professionals exerting control on information and belief systems there. They also infiltrate the private commercial interests associated with space exploration and in turn the media controlling general information flow into the population. The list goes on but you get the picture.

Even so, whether we're talking about those directly and actively involved in secrecy and censorship of information, or professionals acting according to their conditioning, or the media controlling information flow, or populations as a whole, the fact is that we're all part of the problem and we're all complicit and responsible to varying degrees. The secrecy agenda types may be direct and active initiators of and maintain secrecy and thereby ignorance but it cannot be as successful as it is without the acceptance and enablement to varying degrees of general populations too apathetic for their own good. Secrecy ultimately flourishes through root population inertia and abdication of responsibility.

Even our entertainment, sometimes secrecy supported and financed, reinforces and repeatedly pounds in the secrecy psychological concepts and agendas.

For example, the movie "Starship Troopers" introduces and promotes within its entertainment factor a strong overt message that repeated massive hard propaganda produced at government level (what it takes to be a unquestioning citizen that serves the good of the whole) and the them (bugs) or us attitude toward an implacable enemy without concern for right or wrong or any other considerations is a good positive thing. The message there is indeed overt and raw!

Also, consider the "Men in Black" movie. In an early discussion between the new inexperienced man (actor Will Smith) and older experienced man (actor Tommy Lee Jones) characters clearly just outright states as openly as can be what I've been talking about here. The right out in the open statements in this exchange clearly demonstrate just what kind of attitude and lack of respect the secrecy types have for our views out here in the mainstream population. Check it out.

Likewise, the TV series "Stargate SG-1" repeats the underlying theme over and over again in almost every episode that secrecy from the general population is a good positive thing that need not be questioned. We accept this because the hero characters in the series we so readily identify with repeatedly accept this. If it is ever questioned, those doing it are always characterized as negative types that we can't have any sympathy with and therefore do not identify with. Further, the military intelligence conducting all this covert secrecy year after year are obviously our good buddies and salt of the earth people that we can rely on to always have our population's best interest at heart.

It's just all healthy entertainment right? I to enjoyed these popular entertainment vehicles but also recognize the underlying messages in them to. The actors, directors, producers, etc. are not likely to be a direct part of the secrecy agenda of manipulation but they are part of the population whole that are indirectly influenced and have themselves been sucked in and manipulated.

At the base of this seemingly innocent entertainment are the few pursuing their own agendas but wearing the temporary misdirection cloak of doing good for the many and working this strategy toward being the socially accepted norm. Notice that the people (the population) in these entertainment scenarios are never actively involved because that is always characterized as disruption and interference with the few's good works and not to be considered a good thing. That is the secrecy type view but is it really yours? The reality is, WHEN HAS IT EVER BEEN A GOOD THING FOR ENTIRE POPULATIONS TO BE IGNORANT ON THINGS THAT HAVE THE STRONG POTENTIAL TO DIRECTLY IMPACT THEIR LIVES, their future, and the future of their children?

It is in the many thousands of ways like this that mainstream populations are subtly influenced and gradually brought around to accepting the few's perception as being the socially right way to look at things and increasingly entrenched as the socially accepted "norm." But, the truth is that wide spread ignorance is never a good thing and rarely ever has a good result, at least for the people as a whole. Ignorance is a chain that holds one captive by constraining and imprisoning the individual intellect.

So, the bottom line is that it isn't just the secrecy agenda types that are the problem. The truth is that we are all complicit and responsible in our many varying ways. Any change for the better must start with all of us, including the secrecy types, waking up to our contribution to this state of affairs and the need to change course for a better result. Failure to do so, the many plowing along blindly in ignorance, and the few in the know but becoming more and more out of touch with the whole can all be catastrophic in its consequences.

The anomalous planetary visual hard evidence seen here at this Web site is what it is. Look at it, think about it, and arrive at your own conclusions. Let information in, consider it, and think outside the box prescribed for you by others who would bend you away from knowledge and truth. I am satisfied with that because you have at least had the opportunity to view and consider real evidence. The rest is up to you.

Those who consistently block this information from coming into wider population awareness through the mainstream media do not share that outlook. Their agenda is always to keep such information from you, exclusive to themselves, and make your decisions for you. You must decide what you want. I trust your intellect and common sense whereas they want you to trust them without considering any other information or alternatives. That's the difference.