Mars "Dunes" in Infrared

This reporting is going to take a jog to the side and into the Odyssey spacecraft THEMIS imaging of Mars which came right after the MGS MOC and before the Rover, ESA, and now current MRO imaging. This helpful evidence came to my attention via a sharp eyed anonymous viewer in Poland seeing it as strange and wondering what it is?

Before getting into the evidence, here's a little background. The Odyssey THEMIS (Thermal Emission Imaging System) imaging is different because of the satellite camera system. That system covers 5 visual bands and 10 infrared bands and its main" stated" tasks are mapping rock mineralogy via detecting heat signatures. This means that it will see most but not everything in the visual bands we humans are familiar with seeing but should see most heat sources including some that we might not normally see.

In brief and in theory, an active natural geological process like volcanic activity would produce heat and be registered by this camera system including fairly deep underground depending on how large and active the heat source is. Also solar heat reflecting off of most natural geological surfaces would be registered, mapped, and also identified. Conversely, cooler objects not generating or reflecting heat might be invisible to this camera system. Remember all this because it is important to this report and its evidence.

I might add that significantly, although it's not really an issue in this particular report, artificial installations on the planet surface or hidden not too far underground could also presumably be registered and mapped, that is assuming they were generating internal heat. Of course that couldn't possible be a covert part of the Odyssey mission now could it?

In any case, the Odyssey THEMIS image #V16602008 courtesy of Arizona State University is the source of this report's evidence. The location of the evidence on Mars is in Galle Crater also informally known as Smiley Face crater and the evidence in tis strip has been officially identified (as usual) as "dunes."

The above first image here has been reduced in size 30% to demonstrate a context field of view from one side of the strip to the other. Now to make sure that you understand that the darkest color material in the report images here are the so called "dunes" being officially referred to, go to the official science data image found HERE and check out the smaller thumbnail image of the whole strip. You will be able to quickly and clearly see that there is nothing else in the strip that might be remotely confused with "dunes." Also, while you're there, note the official reference that "These dunes are located on the floor of Galle Crater."

Likewise, you should perhaps be aware that the bright reflective patch you see in the lower right corner of the above first image is strong solar light reflecting off of true solid geology. This is normal bare solid particulate geological behavior in the presence of strong sunlight. On the other hand the dull medium color material and its complete lack of reflectivity appears, in my opinion, to be a field of dithering smudge image tampering applications and is typical of such subsequent artificial obfuscation applications in the science data. Such applications are there not only to hide specific anomalous information, they are also there wholesale to destroy context information that evidence might fit into and help in figuring it out as well as to eliminate the ability to determine true size scale for the same reason.

The above second image demonstrates the "dune" evidence that I believe is pertinent here in the full official size with just a little simple clarity and color work in it by me. As you can see, these particular objects do not really look anything like dunes due to the great many tangle of streak projections you see down there. So, with that simple observation in mind, why would they be officially identified as "dunes" if they they don't really resemble sand dunes?

You have to try to understand how the secrecy agenda thinks and works. They really aren't bothering to identify this evidence based on the way it appears in this image as you or I might. Someone at the top knows what this type of evidence is and they know well what they are suppose to identify it as and that constitutes an identification "policy." The policy is what they are going with here, not the look. Since the "dunes" evidence in this infrared image doesn't look anything like sand dunes, this identification by "policy" amounts to a mistake arising out of blind policy dogma and one that we can capitalize on here.

This is how by far the great bulk of the anomalous evidence at this website comes into public awareness. There is either a technical glitch in the automated tampering process and/or a human mistake is made in the programming of what qualifies for tampering and what doesn't. In this case it is the latter. As the years go by, these mistake holes are plugged and the programming evolves and gets better and better as does the technology itself to the point that current imaging data is essentially thoroughly sanitized of truth, but I digress.

The above third and fourth images show increasingly closer views of a portion of the "dune" evidence that I want you to see. As you can see in these views, there isn't even the slightest chance that we are looking at any kind of solid particulate inanimate sand dunes here when judged by appearance. So let me now tell you what I strongly suspect we are really looking at. We are in fact looking at objects that are for example officially identified as "dunes" in the MGS MOC visual band imaging but remember that the bulk of the image in this Odyssey work is infrared and thermal. In other words, what we are primarily seeing here are heat signatures, not objects readily visible to the Earth human eye. The darker the color, the stronger the heat source.

For example, we are seeing mild solar heat absorbed into lighter color rock and soil geology as the terrain background and that would be a normal appearance if it were real but it isn't. The tampering applications cover over the real background detail sanitizing it from view while at the same time trying to mimic the appearance of sand and replicating the basic real terrain color reinforcing the "sand" context false interpretation. The dark streaks are left out to provide some detail. They are "safe" because no one can then figure them out and that is another very human mistake.

Why? Because of the experience a researcher can develop in viewing tens of thousands of images and the evidence in them both with respect to what is real and what isn't. What is anything but normal here by our standards are the many tangled dark slender streak projections sticking off apparently in random in many different directions. Note how the projections tend to cluster in organized formations even as they often appear to be suspended without support in the air as well as laying on the ground. This is the primary evidential subject matter of this reporting.

Now take a look at my 2005 Report #088, 2003 Report #049, and 2001 Report #017 of some of the officially identified "dune" evidence in the MGS MOC imaging. Now also take a look at my 2002 Report #046 colossal tubes evidence and note the faintly seen streak evidence there with the tubes. This evidence even includes the super colossal Richardson Crater enigmatic object in my 2007 Report #129. Note that most of this type of evidence, even though it comes in different shapes and sizes, is for the most part large enough size wise to overcome the poor resolution imaging and shows evidence of streaks from a little to a lot within the formations.

As some of my previous reporting on this type of evidence reflects, I suspect these dark streaks within the body of these formations to be residual evidence of plasma field generation activity and I strongly suspect these partially amorphous shapes to be living organic matter of some life generally unknown to us here on Earth and especially on such a large size scale. Further, I also suspect this life can trace its ancestry far back in very ancient times to Mars sea life that eventually evolved to open air conditions.

When this life is relatively dormant/inactive, it is cool temperature wise with a very tough hard and very solar light reflective exterior surface that often tends to resemble the aerodynamic and officially identified "dune" appearance. When it starts becoming active, its surface softens and turns a very dark solar light energy absorbing color with absolutely no reflectivity and begins to show the presence of some dark streaks within its body. As energy is absorbed and expended via the increasing streak evidence plasma fields, its body turns more translucent and the dark streak presence can be seen much better within its interior. It can also move and shift its bulk and change its shape in place and I suspect it can slowly move from one location to another.

I strongly suspect that the latter described more translucent body plasma energy expenditure stage is what we are looking at here in this Odyssey thermal imaging. We are seeing the heat producing plasma field dark streaks within the body organic tissue material but not the cooler and much more transparent organic tissue itself. In other words, very much like an x-ray of an organic body.

For example an x-ray of human/animal bodies will show heat producing sources within the body as well as high density objects like bones but not the bulk of the broad surface tissue. Conversely an x-ray of a mostly transparent jellyfish or ameba might show nothing there at all. So what we are seeing here is the plasma energy release streak heat signature producing evidence but not the surrounding cooler already partially transparent tissue. This explains why the otherwise random looking plasma release dark streaks are still confined to a well defined area of space, namely within the here unseen "dune" organic body structure.

This suggests that, big or small or colossal in size, most or all of this type of evidence is not hollow inside, unless it has been artificially intervention engineered to be so for specific applications serving the interest of others, but likely solid organic tissue all the way through. That in turn suggests that the colossal tubes in Reports #45 and #46 are solid objects rather than hollow. That means that they are not likely serving as a habitat for others but are colossal size living life forms. It also suggests by implication that Mars has likely been a very stable world over a very long planetary cycle allowing at least some ancient origin life the time to develop and adapt to more gradual environmental changes into the present.

Just in case some may notice this, please note that some of the dark streak plasma evidence in the above imaging appears to be scattered thinly across and on the ground between some of the main formations and out from them rather than concentrated more thickly in the main body formations. Some might interpret this as denying what I am describing here. However, this is typical of this type of evidence.

As I've previously reported, this evidence can concentrate and shift its bulk to one side or the other stretching its organic matter very thinly over the area that it has shifted from but still attached to. It can also flow from one location to another nearby one with the interconnecting bridge of material either bulked up or thinned down low to the ground depending on what stage of transition it is in at the time the camera image was made. In this particular case, the organic matter is thinned down in these transition areas. Since the organic matter itself cannot be seen in this THEMIS infrared imaging and only the streak plasma evidence heat signatures can be seen, the streaks are sparse due to the thinness of the material stretched low to the ground.

Some of you may find this unique Mars bio-life insight boring but it all contributes a little more to our understanding of what is really going on with this planet. I also realize that for some of you this type of reporting may be getting too far away from the familiar and comfortable and that this factor may in turn be rendering the evidence too unbelievable for you. However, individual psychology's not withstanding, evidence is still just evidence and no less real just because of its unfamiliarity. Just keep remembering that this is another world with its own developmental paths.

DOCUMENTATION

http://themis-data.asu.edu/img/V16602008: This link takes you to the official #V16602008 Odyssey THEMIS science data image at Arizona State University that is the source of my evidence here. There are multiple image formats available here but I would suggest the .GIF strip as the other formats that should have more detail in them, do not.

http://themis.asu.edu/zoom-20051212a: This alternative link also takes you to the same official #V16602008 Odyssey THEMIS science data image at Arizona State University as an image of the day that is the source of my evidence here. This link offers more context information to go along with the strip including the "dunes" official interpretation.

, Investigator