MORE MOON EVIDENCE-7
Report 205
August 1, 2011
This report will be about visual evidence on the surface of the Moon drawn from the Apollo 8 mission images. It deals with evidence ranging from possible tall large structures and vegetation to image tampering and including what even appears to be a lake of self leveling fluid. Now let's get started.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down to AS08-13-2350 choose high resolution
image)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS08-13-2350
The above 1st image suggests two different types of evidence. One is artificial structures and the other is vegetation. Note the knobby rough textures in the terrain best seen in the right half of the image. This suggests some kind of vegetation rather than geology. On the other hand, note the bright white partially obscured ring in the lower half of the image on the left. Note how our view of the back portion of the white ring is blocked by something solid and large rising in height from the center area of the ring. Let's take a closer look at this ring structure evidence in the next image.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down to AS08-13-2350 choose high resolution
image)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS08-13-2350
As you can see in the above 2nd image,
there appear to be multiple height structures rising from the center area
of the white ring and this structure evidence is blocking our view of the
back white area of the ring. There are a couple of things that you should
take into consideration when you are examining this structure evidence.
First is the white ring itself. Note that the white ring appears to be of
equal depth and reflective quality all the way around. This is typical of
other such rings in this and other Apollo 8 images. This configuration would
not be the case if this was what we would normally assume it to be which would
be an impact crater depression. Normally an impact crater would be a depression
in the center of the impact area and a to some degree raised rim on the periphery
of the depression. In an impact crater scenario the crater would catch sunlight
creating a shadow in one side of the crater and a bright sunlight portion
on the other side of the crater with the degree of that brightness or shadow
dependent on the sun light angle. This is not the case here.
In other words, we are not looking at an impact crater depression here. There
are quite a few of these rings around on the Moon in the Apollo 8 imaging,
including more in this particular image, and often they are characterized
by very dark heavily obscured mass like this rising in height from the ring's
center area and that height blocks the view of the rear portion of the ring.
The trouble is that the dark material is just too dark to make out much detail
within the elevated mass. So I do not normally report on this type of evidence
giving up on it as a lost cause when it comes to viewers being able to interpret
what is really going on here.
Indeed here the darkness does not appear to be shadow but a dark application
on the structures. True shadow always has some transparency depth to it and
as such it will lighten a bit in a graphics program. However, an image tampering
application is a solid coating with no transparency depth to it at all and
therefore it will not respond at all to lightening in a graphics program.
That appears to be the case here.
Therefore, in my opinion, these dark areas are not any kind of shadow but
dark applications meant to obscure and hide detail where they are present.
Normally I would pass and not present this kind of evidence. However, I've
presented this here because I suspect many of you will be able to see the
bits and pieces of light reflective hard surfaces rising in height from the
ring's center area that the dark application did not quite cover and recognize
that this is almost certainly some sort of artificial high rise large facility
evidence.
I also suspect that the bright light reflective ring itself is not the upper
rim portion of an impact crater depression at all but something like an artificially
created ring shaped circular canal or moat system filled with some kind of
light colored substance that provides the ringed center area with a measure
of security. If so, then the question becomes security from what on the Moon?
Logically the security must be for something limited to ground surface level
in order for this kind of protection to be effective.
Now the presence of artificial structure evidence within these ringed areas
around in this Mare Tranquillitatis terrain that appear to be in the open
and not protected for example within a visible dome shell seal can be significant
in other ways. For example, unless those who built this are machines or beings
adapted in some way to airless or near airless conditions, it suggests environmental
air breathing ability, at least in this locale on the Moon. That in turn suggests
an environment with atmosphere. That in turn gives a little more credit to
the possibility that vegetation appearing as knobby terrain in the 1st image
may be present.
Remember, if one can eventually come to accept that intelligent technologically
advanced organic life actually exists on the Moon, one should not sell their
technology development short by insisting that this or that can't be done.
It may not can be done by our current technology standards but we cannot say
what others may or may not be able to accomplish with their technology.
For example, on an original theoretically airless moon any organic air breathing
creature wishing to operate on the surface unencumbered by survival gear would
be compelled to solve the problem presented by an airless external environment.
It would have been among the first primary problems needing to be solved and
receiving greater concentration. The same would be true of their logically
anticipating the problem that visitors from nearby neighboring Earth would
eventually be coming to the Moon to complicate their existence and that problem
must be anticipated and dealt with in advance.
Remember as well that visitors from Earth, if Antarctica rumors of alien presence
there and in the Southern Sea are true, may include those who are not native
Earth humans as well. In other words, from someone else's point of view, it
may not necessarily be all about defensive positions directed at we Earth
humans in the perception and reactions of anyone on the Moon. Our belief and
assumption that we as a species are alone on Earth and in this solar system
may have no bearing at all on the positions that others take.
Let's face it, if that white ring is a security moat of some kind, it suggests
that there are unknown dynamics at play on the Moon's surface that we are
completely ignorant of. If true of that, then it could be true of other things
as well. That means it would be a serious mistake and perhaps outright dangerous
to make any assumptions based on our ignorance or conditioned belief systems
about what is possible or not on the Moon. First we must accept and admit
to our ignorance and proceed from there.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down to AS08-13-2350 choose high resolution
image)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS08-13-2350
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down to AS08-13-2348 choose high resolution
image)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS08-13-2348
On the other hand, in the above 3rd
and 4th images, note the big very long dark shadow thrown by the center right
geological formation. Note that the formation is simply not tall enough to
be throwing a shadow so long and massive, even with low sun light angle and
there appears to be no downward slope in the terrain to our left of the formation
that might account for the big long shadow. Note that the largest and longest
shadow direction as pointed out by upper three red arrows is different than
some of the other nearby lesser shadows in the terrain above it.
Further, a closer look (not shown here) demonstrates that this longest dark
shadow is too dense and unresponsive to graphic program lightening suggesting
that it is also an image tampering application rather than true shadow. Likewise,
closer examination reveals that the edges of the big long tapered shadow are
two sharp and well defined running straight across and unaffected by variations
in the terrain and that would not be the case with real shadow.
Likewise, even if the big long shadows in either image are real, then it is
of an object in the terrain that is missing. This suggests that a tall object
has been visually eliminated from the image by image tampering. Such a concept
brings to mind the immense Moon tower evidence that I've previously reported
on in Report
#067 in May of 2004 from the Clementine Moon imaging that has since been
sanitized from the official record as per my Report
#180. However, I strongly suspect that these long shadows are not real
but an image tampering unresponsive application hiding something at this spot
as is the purpose of so many of the dark areas that are suppose to be shadows
in this Apollo 8 imaging but aren't.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down to AS08-13-2351 choose high resolution
image)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS08-13-2351
In the above 5th image, you see the
remnants of a white ring but here visually severely compromised inside and
out by a rough texture pattern that extends well out into the surrounding
terrain covering everything there. This pattern resembles vegetation but I'm
of the opinion that in this particular case it is image tampering application
using a texture pattern that was a poor choice to be using on the Moon.
Why? Well because the Moon is suppose to be airless in theory making vegetation
impossible and yet this pattern contrarily tends to remind one of vegetative
growth. So, if it isn't vegetation and it obviously isn't geology, then what
else could it be? The dark shadow obfuscation applications most often used
in this Apollo 8 imaging would have been a more effective choice because the
shadows at least do not suggest the possibility of bio-life as does this type
of obscuring texture pattern application.
Further, the presence of this particular texture pattern brings doubt to what
appears to be vegetation in the 1st image. Why? Simply because it may just
be a different obfuscation application pattern that looks even more like vegetation.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down to AS08-13-2333 choose high resolution
image)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS08-13-2333
The above white out 6th image may seem blank but it isn't. The image is just over saturated with white color and is just as it appears in the official science data. The over saturated white is likely just another method of image tampering added to eliminate evidence. The whole of the Moon terrain is like this in this AS08-13-2333 image while the sky above the horizon is normal black by the Apollo 8 standard of that released to the public and science communities. If any scientist encountered this kind of image, most would just abandon it and move on to another image. That is why this obfuscation tactic is most effective.
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photo13-e.htm
(scroll down to AS08-13-2333 choose high resolution
image)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS08-13-2333
However, the white over saturation is
sometimes something that can be dealt with by a graphics program and in this
case quite nicely. The above 7th image is of the exact
same scene as in the 6th image but now darkened with contrast added
and revealing anomalous evidence hidden by the white over saturation tactical.
As you can see pointed out by the three red arrows and label, there appears
to be a lake of some self leveling fluid substance.
In my opinion, a rough but very subtle texture pattern has been added on just
about everything in this scene except the portion of the lake that we see
here. The reason this lake was left out of the tampering to some extent may
have to do with the limitations of the tampering technology of the 1960s and
1970s. On the other hand, some rebel may have intentionally left it for a
future researcher to find. Maybe but more likely the tampering software of
the time (December 1968) wasn't up to dealing with smooth placid surfaces
like this lake with the texture pattern chosen. So a quick white over saturation
solution was employed and effective.
It should be noted that Apollo 8 was not a mission to land anyone on the Moon
but designed as an orbiting vehicle that was suppose to develop more information
of the Moon's surface for future manned landings. Also, the images from this
mission were geared to be presented on TV to the public and short preparation
(obfuscation) time would have been a factor under those circumstances. When
the tampering software did not visually eliminate this lake with the too subtle
texture pattern, the too bright white over saturation of the image as a quick
and easy follow up tactic would have predictably resulted in this image's
elimination from TV exposure and it later could have simply been forgotten
after that exposure risk was dealt with.
So there you have it. In AS08-13-2350 there is
some very suggestive artificial structure evidence within a ring, some possible
adjacent vegetation evidence, and some likely image tampering evidence mimicking
shadows. In AS08-13-2348 there is more of the
tampering evidence mimicking shadows. In AS08-13-2351
there is a different rough texture pattern application covering everything
and in AS08-13-2333 there is white out over saturation
hiding a lake of liquid.
Once early in this work I had a NASA scientist and friend of Arthur C. Clarke
who had involved him in some evidence I presented get angry with me. His complaint
expressed was that it was "unfair" of me to be presenting evidence
drawn from the old Apollo Moon data and Viking Mars data because that early
data did have some "problems." I countered then and now that I do
not make any of the evidence I present, only discover it in the official data
and reveal it. I interpreted his outburst as a near admission of the "problems"
from my own point of view with this data.
In other words, as anyone can prove to themselves in the verification process
at the links to the official science data always provided, I do not make or
create this anomalous evidence. It exists and is verifiable in the official
science data quite apart from me at the links always provided and so cannot
just be ignored as though it doesn't exist. I merely publicly reveal what
already exists for viewer consideration.
, Investigator
